Legal actions against Inman
This is a discussion on Legal actions against Inman within the YMMSS/STA Complaints forum, part of the Internet HYIP Scams category; Lawyers within the World Law Direct group have concluded a 90 day investigation of Kim Inman, his organization, and others ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 212
|
Lawyers within the World Law Direct group have concluded a 90 day investigation of Kim Inman, his organization, and others that have worked with him.
WLD staff have decided, basically as a public service, to take legal action against Inman and others in the federal and state courts, and to consult in detail again with the criminal division of the IRS. The lawyers will also assist anybody that has problems or inquiries dealing with the IRS and/or the affected tax returns. We will be posting information and instructions this week as to next steps. The lawyers are confident Inman will be brought to justice and that his (and other) assets will be seized and returned to investors. If you need to contact the involved lawyers urgently for any reason, please use the web form on the home page of the World Law Direct site. (Click "Home" at the top of this page) or at this link: http://www.worldlawdirect.com/asklawyer.php -- There is no charge. Kind regards. WLD support staff |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 80
|
THANK YOU, WLD. THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
God Bless you world law And too you Righteous anger for all your help
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
An emotional "thank you" from me to WLD (and to RA)!!!
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I also want to thank Drankoolaid for keeping up the fight esp. during those times when we victims didn't know if we were being heard at all.
Kudos as well to those who provided the evidences we needed. I hope they see this post, for I would like to offer a sincere (and humble) "thank you". |
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
If you only have time to file ONE, make it with http://www.ic3.gov/complaint/ - it will then be disseminated to the rightful authoritieS. As stated previously, once you have made contact (with IC3), you are given the option to provide updated information at any time. Thanks again - to all who have and will make these reports. RA (who thought a less "angry," more affirmative username more appropriate). ;o) Last edited by YMSurvivor; Mar 21st, 2007 at 01:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I happened upon your forums yesterday, and promptly wrote several posts in the sta-forums informing members of the impending litigation against Kim Inman.
I also warned them AGAINST falling for the "rescue plan" being cooked up by some of the former members to take advantage of the situation. It makes me sick to think that they might get away with it. Anyway, I was not able to check for responses before all my posts were deleted and my account cancelled by moderators, which I fully expected to happen. I did notice one private message in my inbox before I lost access to the Office, so hopefully I got to at least one person who might have fallen for the trap. WLD, thank you for doing this! On a sidenote: I got in under the old business plan and actually made much more money than I put in. At that time, I was among the naive who thought the business would last forever. It nearly destroyed my life regardless -- I stopped working and put off applying to grad school thinking I could fall back on my YMMSS income for many years. It basically took away a year of my life and put me deeper into debt. Most of this was my fault. I should have known. My question is this: Could I get in trouble for any reason since I didn't actually lose any money? In fact, I actually made money off of many people who happened to come in later than I did and never saw a dime themselves. I did not, however, recruit a single person to the business. How might I be impacted by this lawsuit? Thanks. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Sounds like you were mislead like everyone else.
Also sounds like you were a financial loser in the end. When we no better we do better -- The fact that you didn't actively recruit and the fact you were ultimately a financial loser simply makes you another naive victim of the scheme -- in my opinion -- Those that made money and kept it were most vocal in recruitment -- These people may in fact have some trouble especially the well know 'players' of the Inman Ponzi -- Visit MatrixWatch.org and get yourself listed on the consumer movement list there - file complaints especially with the IC3 all resources cam be found at MatrixWatch.org To my knowledge the WLD admin/lawyers will not answer direct questions posed individually on these threads (in most cases anyways) - WLD we be coming out with another more detailed announcement soon at least that is my understanding -- You can also contact/access WLD Attorney's off of the main page of this site -- Hope This Helps - Best Regards, Michael |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 80
|
Quote:
The impact you experience will likely depend on your profit. I would think it unlikely you'd be prosecuted, though it's not unheard of for "early birds" to be sued - in order to assist in remuneration of latecomers. Unless a WLD rep answers you, there's just no telling about any of this. At this stage of the game, it's doubtful they could give you a definitive answer. Since you're apparently serious about exposing this scam, you can report it directly to http://www.ic3.gov/ The information you give there will be distributed among all appropriate authorities. Best of luck and congrats for "seeing the light!" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
For my own clarification and possibly that of others, does "basically as a public service" mean this action is being done pro bono and World Law Direct intends to take no fees if any funds are recovered or is World Law Direct working this on a contingency basis. The word "basically" seems to allow some wiggle room between working entirely free and perhaps working for a lower than normal contingency fee. Hoping to derail any potential confusion or disillusion. Thanks in advance for your response. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
This thread has 112 replies and has been viewed 11916 times
«
YMMSS Perps: Still Livin' the Good Lie
|
Author Stephen C. Rose May Have Profited From 30M Ponzi Scheme
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fraud charges against Kim Inman | Unregistered | YMMSS/STA Complaints | 51 | Sep 16th, 2009 09:53 PM |
| Kim Inman took from me. Is the IRS arresting him? | Unregistered | Debt Collection | 0 | Sep 9th, 2009 12:32 PM |
| Arrest of Kim Inman and his wife | Unregistered | Arrests, Searches, Seizures | 2 | Aug 19th, 2009 10:38 AM |
| Was Bank Teller's actions legal? | Unregistered | Other Business & Finance Law Issues | 1 | May 20th, 2008 08:31 AM |
| legal actions based on verbal agreement? | puzzle | Debt Collection | 1 | Aug 26th, 2007 01:08 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:33 AM.











Linear Mode

