Legal actions against Inman

You could also have your own lawyer take steps instead of having the free

lawyers do it. Then you could know any and all information, times, documents

etc. I have done that in other cases where a group of lawyers is pursuing

the main case, pushing for criminal law actions and the like.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

You could also have your own lawyer take steps instead of having the free

lawyers do it. Then you could know any and all information, times, documents

etc. I have done that in other cases where a group of lawyers is pursuing

the main case, pushing for criminal law actions and the like.

Right, but I find it so strange then WLD does not just follow thru with what they said they were doing SO SO LONG AGO NOW !. If they did really prosecute INMAN and kept us informed we'd be a happy bunch of campers. I HOPE soon they will jam it to that robber thief INMAN .

I know that they did subpoena my accounting records.

And I was interviewed by them and state officials briefly seven weeks ago. Guess justice moves slowly but since it is for free I am thankful, as I am a pensioner and could not possibly afford counsel after having lost all my mmoney to kim Inman!

ymmss

I do not know how Kim and Sue sleep at night knowing they took my sons disability settlement, promising him that he would double his money over and over and over again. He never cycled once after sending them $11,950.00 and now he has nothing.
I do hope and pray that they are brought to Justice and pay for their crime

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I know that they did subpoena my accounting records.

And I was interviewed by them and state officials briefly seven weeks ago. Guess justice moves slowly but since it is for free I am thankful, as I am a pensioner and could not possibly afford counsel after having lost all my mmoney to kim Inman!

AND THAT CROOK INMAN IS NOWHERE NEAR RECEIVING JUSTICE ! DIDN'T EVEN HAVE TO FLEE TO HIS BELIZE HUT. NOT EVEN APPREHNDED YET. AND THESE WLD ATTYS SAID LONG AGO THEY WERE ACTING.....

WHAT ???? ! COULD THE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS OF OUR DEPT OF JUSTICE OR THE INDIANA ATTY GENERAL BE WAITING FOR TO INDICT HIM AND PUT US ON OUR WAY TO A JUDGE/COURT-ORDERED RESTITUTION RECOVERY ? ? ? ? ?

Financial offenses always take a long time to process unfortunately.

This one below that i have also been following on this forum took over ten months before the culprits were charged:

____________________

[Global Online direct and AINdenver.com

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Litigation Release No. 20415 / December 21, 2007
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. JARROD W. MCMILLIN, INNOVATIVE PROJECTS, INC., LAURENCE G. YOUNG, ANNE B. LIEBERMANN, AND JASON A. KOLAKOWSKI, CASE NO. 07- CV — 02636 REB - MEH (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO) December 21, 2007
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it filed a civil action in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado based on an ongoing fraudulent scheme operating under the names American Investors Network (“AIN”), Fairweather Management, and Access Funding. The Commission charged Jarrod W. McMillin, Laurence Young, Anne B. Liebermann, and Jason A. Kolakowski, all of whom live in the Denver area, and Innovative Projects, Inc., an Arkansas corporation controlled by McMillin, with conducting a “Ponzi” scheme by paying purported returns to early investors using money provided by later investors. The Commission charged all of the defendants with violating the antifraud and securities offering registration provisions of the federal securities laws. The Commission also charged each of the individual defendants with violating the broker-dealer registration provisions of the federal securities laws. On the Commission’s application, the Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order, Asset Freeze and Other Equitable Relief, and Order Setting Preliminary Injunction Hearing (“Order”).

In its Complaint, the Commission alleges that, from approximately February 2007 through the present, McMillin and Innovative, doing business as AIN, and Young, doing business as Fairweather and Access Funding, raised up to $2.9 million from investors. They solicited investors by misrepresenting that they would use invested funds to purchase advertising for a variety of products AIN and Fairweather purportedly sold. However, investor funds were not used to advertise or sell these products. According to the Complaint, McMillin and Young instead used investor money to pay other investors, pay commissions to salespeople, and for their personal expenses, among other things. The Commission alleges that Liebermann and Kolakowski acted as salespeople for the Ponzi scheme and, with McMillin and Young, continued to solicit and lull investors through November 2007. The Complaint also alleges that all of the defendants participated in unregistered offers and sales of securities, and that McMillin, Young, Liebermann, and Kolakowski acted as unregistered broker-dealers.

The Complaint claims that, based on this conduct, all of the defendants violated Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The Complaint also claims that McMillin, Young, Liebermann, and Kolakowski violated Exchange Act Section 15(a). Among other things, the Court’s Order prohibits McMillin and Young, pending a hearing, from disposing of any assets and prohibits financial institutions holding these defendants’ assets from allowing any withdrawals. The Order also requires that the defendants notify the Court of each account they hold with a financial or brokerage institution.

Hi just wondering if there has been any updates to all of this? I was scammed out of $3500 myself.

Thanks

I'm not sure there has been any update but I had sent Mr. Inmann a certified letter asking him to update my 1099 showing that there was not payments made to me in 06 or ever for that matter and he did in fact sign for the letter. This was on 3/3/08. So who known's what he is going to do. I sure hope he sends an amended 1099 to the IRS to clear this up. Has anyone else experienced this?