Indiana Attorney general

I just got a new letter from the indiana attorney general telling me that the jurisdiction for this would be under ind code 24-5-0.5-2. They say I'm under the consumer protection division and is limited to consumer transactions. they are sending me to the secretary of state securities division
302 W. washington Street, Room E111
Indianapolis, IN 46204

317-232-6682

[George]

...and just think...KIM AND COMPANY'S PROBLEMS would probably not have developed to this point (at least not yet) had they not have sent out those FRAUDULENT 1099'S !!

OH WELL !!!

George, one would think after the thousands of complaints from the 2005 fraudulent 1099s he would have learned? R.

Originally Posted by Unregistered George, one would think after the thousands of complaints from the 2005 fraudulent 1099s he would have learned? R.

No doubt he has been inundated with lawsuits,and investigations from every direction...hence he he has decided to toss in the towel....surprised he lasted this long. The dream he had a long time ago has evolved into a nitemare for him. BUT even BANKRUPTCY does not relieve him of any existing or forthcoming CRIMINAL CHARGES which may arise nor problems with the IRS. I'm sure if he has any resources left, he will have to use the money to defend himself via legal expenses.
Too bad...he probably won't have enough money left to sponsor another INDIANA CORNFIELD FISH FRY !

...and Esto, if you read this post, see if you can use yourself-appointed profound wisdom and articulation skills to 'articulate" your way out of this mess !!

George

I'm waiting to see a few shift their diets from Omaha steaks to dog food.

LOL!

Am I correct here. If Kim files a chapter 7 that will only protect him from the creditors. Will he still be liable to pay back those he robbed and face tax evasion charges still? I though of this also, for those of us who paid Kims taxes for him last year 2005 of course not knowing any better. What will come of that. We paid multiple thousands on our last years bogus 1099 and did the wash as he told us. Will he have to face up to the former fraudulent 1099s of 2005 also? R.