"In-the-knows" have painted themselves into a corner

Originally Posted by Unregistered

And there's no denying that there clearly has been a concerted effort to make people believe.

An effort to "make" people believe? You must be the type that blames everyone else for all perceived misfortunes, a cry baby of the first order. You exhibit a more desperate need to believe than anyone else, that's why you have to declare mindlessly that SI is a scam, "period" while not having a clue of what's going on because "you" are not yet in the mix (or have dealt yourself out of the game by settling through the attorneys which would really explain your tantrums).

The result of your certainty that SI is a scam must certainly have led you to remove your e-mail address associated with your initial investment with SI, right? Otherwise you are an insufferable hypocrite and must be out of a job (we can see why) and must occupy your crying in your pillow hours with *****ing at the moon.

You snivel "you won't convince me" as if we could possibly care! What you don't get is that it's not about you, never has, and that's what bugs you the most and if you litigated with the law firm the rest of this story is "really" not about you.

The process is substantiated and experienced and your boo-hooing is as irrelevant as your "beliefs", and apparently you, are.

Stick out your alms cup and I'll drop in a shilling for your troubled existence.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

An effort to "make" people believe? You must be the type that blames everyone else for all perceived misfortunes, a cry baby of the first order. You exhibit a more desperate need to believe than anyone else, that's why you have to declare mindlessly that SI is a scam, "period" while not having a clue of what's going on because "you" are not yet in the mix (or have dealt yourself out of the game by settling through the attorneys which would really explain your tantrums).

The result of your certainty that SI is a scam must certainly have led you to remove your e-mail address associated with your initial investment with SI, right? Otherwise you are an insufferable hypocrite and must be out of a job (we can see why) and must occupy your crying in your pillow hours with *****ing at the moon.

You snivel "you won't convince me" as if we could possibly care! What you don't get is that it's not about you, never has, and that's what bugs you the most and if you litigated with the law firm the rest of this story is "really" not about you.

The process is substantiated and experienced and your boo-hooing is as irrelevant as your "beliefs", and apparently you, are.

Stick out your alms cup and I'll drop in a shilling for your troubled existence.

You're questioning that there's been an effort to convince people that something is happening and they will be paid? There's are whole forums full of posts which demonstrate the fact.

The rest of your psycho-babble analysis of me, as incorrect as it is, isn't surprising as it's the typical fall-back when you can't present any substantive defense. The 'period' reference very obviously was mocking the previous KoolAid drinker's mindless belief so your comments more appropriately apply to them.

And if you knew *** you were talking about you'd understand that, at least if this fairy tale were real, those who worked through the attorneys initially would not have removed themselves from any further process or claims against the company and, in fact, they'd likely be in front of you in line.

So thus far the 'substance' of responses from your side can be summarized as:

a. You don't know what you're talking about
b. It IS happening, it WILL happen
c. I could tell you but then I'd have to kill you
d. You're Bill Martonelli

Very impressive. Anything you'd like to add Cletus? LOL

Those of you who believe and know, how about shutting the **** up.

**** = f uck
phuq
fukk

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Those of you who believe and know, how about shutting the **** up.

Yea, you're right. We should just sit back and listen to
all you retards talk negative all day. There is nothing but
glass is half empty and any other kind of deflating types of
thinking that takes place in this GOD-forsaken forum.

TOOLS!

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Sucks for you KoolAid drinkers when you're not where people just accept it and you have to defend your crap doesn't it? LOL

International query here, What does "KoolAid drinkers" mean? Never heard of any drink of that name

Originally Posted by Unregistered

International query here, What does "KoolAid drinkers" mean? Never heard of any drink of that name

It is an American drink you mix from a powder but the reference is to an American cult led by Jim Jones back in the late 1970's the whole group led by him moved to Guyana and when pursued by Congressman Leo Ryan, committed mass suicide by drinking what is commonly referred to as grape kool aid laced with poison - the entire compound, men, women and children.

Therefore, today, drinking the koolaid is a reference to being led down the path of destruction by a crazy leader, no reference meant to koolaid being bad (although some flavors are rather nasty unless you're a kid - bubble gum?). The whole story is in Wikipedia and all over - just google Jim Jones....he's a winner....he drank the koolaid too, he did.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

International query here, What does "KoolAid drinkers" mean? Never heard of any drink of that name

"Kool-Aid drinkers" are mindless followers in some belief, as in the case of the Jonestown cult where some 900 members all drank a cyanide-laced "Kool-Aid," a branded flavored-drink mix, in a mass suicide as directed by their leader Jim Jones. Looks that it wasn't actually the Kool-Aid brand, but the name stuck anyway.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Yea, you're right. We should just sit back and listen to
all you retards talk negative all day. There is nothing but
glass is half empty and any other kind of deflating types of
thinking that takes place in this GOD-forsaken forum.

TOOLS!

I might be wrong, but I think he's on your side and saying you're talking too much. Don't want to p*ss-off the German judge..... there's a gag order you know. LOL

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I might be wrong, but I think he's on your side and saying you're talking too much. Don't want to p*ss-off the German judge..... there's a gag order you know. LOL

Don't forget the NDA that applies to every scam that doesn't pay.Great to hide behind that myth.Lol.