"In-the-knows" have painted themselves into a corner

Bla,bla,bla,bla,bla,bla............This is supreme Bull****, elaborated and eloquent, but still Bull****:


Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:31 pm Post subject:
gcark wrote:
I'm disapointed that Senior members whould act this way. Like you Burroak, you call the guy a troll, then the very next statement out of your mouth, about mirages, is in agreement with the guy??!! I don't think it would hurt to be a little more understanding!!
24carat wrote:
A mirage....not a good analogy, Burr. Mirages disappear as one gets closer. I'll leave it to you to come up with something more appropriate; my brain is tired tonight.24c
Not a problem 24...let me help you and gcark out a bit.
A mirage is a naturally-occurring optical phenomenon, in which light rays are bent to produce a displaced image of distant objects or the sky.
The etymology is traced back to the Latin, mirare…meaning to appear…to seem…and is the same root with which we derive mirror. The two types of mirages are termed Inferior and Superior and which one you may experience has to do with the atmospheric conditions.
Instances of inferior mirages are common such as when light refracts sky and appears as pools that aren’t there. The water is actually an image of a thing that is actually elsewhere (the sky). This inferior mirage is also commonly experience as a road mirage. That said…it is not the use of mirage purposed in
my comment...and second guessing my choice is premature.
I reference the mirage phenomenon of the superior image. It is witnessed in the presence of a temperature inversion when the upper atmosphere is warmer than the air near the ground. In the case
of the superior mirage the image indeed mirrors the actual object but in such a way as making distances from the observer to the object difficult to calculate.
An example of a superior mirage would be a distant shoreline made towering, looking higher…thus perhaps closer…than it is in reality, but because of the turbulences there seem to be dancing spikes, towers and so forth. This type of mirage is also called the Fata Morgana.
Superior images can be straight up or upside down, depending on the distance of the true object. Oftenthe image appears as a distorted mixture of up and down parts...but the object imaged is indeed stillthere. The interesting thing about superior mirage images is that due to the curvature of the earth light rays can travel large distances, perhaps even from beyond the horizon.
This was observed for the first time in 1596, when a ship under the command of Willem Barents lookingfor the Northeast Passage got stuck in the ice at Novaya Zemlya and the crew had to endure the polar winter there. They saw their midwinter night ending with the rise of a distorted sun about 2 weeks earlier than expected. The inversion layer must have just the right temperature gradient to make this possible. In the same way ships which are in reality so far away that they should not have been visible above the
geometric horizon, may appear on the horizon, or even above the horizon as superior mirages. This may explain some stories about flying ships or coastal cities in the sky, as described by some polar explorers. I experience this phenomenon quite regularly myself in Oklahoma where I see the town I am
traveling to, being fifteen miles away, floating above the horizon and appearing as close as just over the next rise.
Thus it is not the case, regularly, that a mirage is something that is not there. Indeed in the superior mirages the object awaits apprehension. The town I’m traveling to always get reached…only later than it
appeared I would. The flying ship always descends and delivers its goods at the port from which it was anticipated and at times are seen before the actually break the horizon.
Images of real objects whether perceived as topsy-turvy at times or just out of reach when the distance is greater than anticipated…these objects eventually can be experienced as true and present when the space between subject and object is finally closed.
Even the pie-in-the-sky quip should not be too quickly dismissed as an inferior mirage…rather a superior imaged dessert that is really there to be served up at a designated appointment a little ways away. It might even be a candidate for one of the mysteriously powerful ironies sought for by another member here.
Ergo…once again…the quintessential analogy is once again employed by the ole Burrr. I sure hope it will not be required to explain the use of every nuance of usage…I’ve got chores to do. See...wasn't that
nice of me?
With all humilité,
Burrr

TheOscar54
Active Member
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 371
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:27 am Post subject:

I have written before that I believe 2 of the 4 banks are involved in hedge funds with one bank having a group of funds in the top 10 in the world. I have watched a particular fund from 1 bank and everytime we hear of a payout the fund goes down suggesting profit taking and then the fund is up or equal again. I also believe that when SI lost the cort case they were convinced of the opposite, no payment for anyone. The cort saw things in favor of the members (thank goodness) and from as near as I can tell that was about last Oct/Nov. with the new company scrambling for solutions. I believe the solution they decided upon with the corts permission was to start the hedge fund in at least 2 if not all of the banks .. I can only see the performance of one of them. The actual case remains open with the main banks and the funds under supervision.I am sure it was a huge risk for them to agree but I again speculate that they were allowed to take the remaining net balance and hit the markets for profit.
One bank was up by 15% last year which means that if the fund was operating with 700 billion it was making enough for operating costs and payment to members. That would be about 100 billion per month not including overhead costs and member payments. Since the banks are involved they must clear a certain amount of profit also which is why we see a "reload" almost every other day.
There was no escrow as far as I am concerned because no financial entity would allow that much to be static and if there was enough money in the accounts they would have paid out right away.
Budi's post makes good sense if you understand what goes on behind the scenes because most of it is verifiable and makes good sense. This is why I have written a few times "They are watching" because investors have "think tanks" and they look for key words anywhere they can find them. I have stated that this recent banking move makes sense because our payouts are the last of all of the groups but perhaps the most complex. I still want to suggest that SP and RP have been honored which would mean much higher payouts but remember all of the qualifiers must be met. This recent "redefining" just means the bank is moving assets elsewhere and they have all ready calculated what we are to be paid .. For the rest of the rumors ask everyone else my contacts are in high end banking .. now put away the nasty pen and start talking about things that matter .. Wayyy ohhh wayyy oh wayyyy ohh wayyyyy
DAnnnssinn inta da night !!
Signed Sir Leprechaun

This Oscar dude is like so full of cow manure.
Dude your talking out of yr behind.
What court order dude? There aint no court order.
Have you seen this court order? I betcha u havent.
The German Courts dont know nothing about this BS court order which Pingy has been talking about.
One more thing dude IF this court order exists and thats a big IF the funds would be in escrow and not allowed to be traded on with hedging or whatever BS your suggesting.
And whats this? One bank up by 15% based on trading amount of 700 billion???
That bank Oscar is talking about is Barclays.
Dude you really need to do your research (Wikipedia)

On 30 August 2007, Barclays was forced to borrow £1.6bn ($3.2bn) from the Bank of England sterling standby facility. This is made available as a last-resort when banks are unable to settle their debts to other banks at the end of daily trading.

Despite rumours about liquidity at Barclays, the loan was necessary due to a technical problem with their computerised settlement network. A Barclays spokesman was quoted as saying "There are no liquidity issues in the U.K markets. Barclays itself is flush with liquidity."

On 9 November 2007, Barclays shares dropped 9% and were even temporarily suspended for a short period of time, due to rumours of a $10bn (£4.8bn) exposure to bad debts in the US. However, a Barclays spokesman denied the rumours.

Subsequent write-downs at the bank were announced to be £1 billion ($1.9 billion), much less than feared.

In July 2008, Barclays attempted to raise £4.5bn through a non-traditional rights issue to shore up its weakened Tier 1 capital ratio, which involved a rights offer to existing shareholders and the sale of a stake to Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation. Only 19 per cent of shareholders took up their rights leaving investors China Development Bank and Qatar Investment Authority with increased holdings in the bank.

Man it never ceases to amaze me what BS these people spin and how gullible these cheeries are lapping up everything they get told.
Goes to prove one point - BS baffles brains!!

Originally Posted by Unregistered

What about PG forum updates??? No hero??

What's the point dude. They spin the same BS over there too.
Dont u get it??
Chain of command >> simonsage >> topcrap & budinogower >> german group >> PHP & PG forums >> cheerleading team (yay! yay! yay!)
Thats how it works.
The PG groupies have their little chat sessions everyday (suppose to be big secret...pssst! dont tell anyone what we tell ya)
Conclusion?? Non the wiser.
Where theres s.h.i.t theres flys.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Bla,bla,bla,bla,bla,bla............This is supreme Bull****, elaborated and eloquent, but still Bull****:


Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:31 pm Post subject:
gcark wrote:
I'm disapointed that Senior members whould act this way. Like you Burroak, you call the guy a troll, then the very next statement out of your mouth, about mirages, is in agreement with the guy??!! I don't think it would hurt to be a little more understanding!!
24carat wrote:
A mirage....not a good analogy, Burr. Mirages disappear as one gets closer. I'll leave it to you to come up with something more appropriate; my brain is tired tonight.24c
Not a problem 24...let me help you and gcark out a bit.
A mirage is a naturally-occurring optical phenomenon, in which light rays are bent to produce a displaced image of distant objects or the sky.
The etymology is traced back to the Latin, mirare…meaning to appear…to seem…and is the same root with which we derive mirror. The two types of mirages are termed Inferior and Superior and which one you may experience has to do with the atmospheric conditions.
Instances of inferior mirages are common such as when light refracts sky and appears as pools that aren’t there. The water is actually an image of a thing that is actually elsewhere (the sky). This inferior mirage is also commonly experience as a road mirage. That said…it is not the use of mirage purposed in
my comment...and second guessing my choice is premature.
I reference the mirage phenomenon of the superior image. It is witnessed in the presence of a temperature inversion when the upper atmosphere is warmer than the air near the ground. In the case
of the superior mirage the image indeed mirrors the actual object but in such a way as making distances from the observer to the object difficult to calculate.
An example of a superior mirage would be a distant shoreline made towering, looking higher…thus perhaps closer…than it is in reality, but because of the turbulences there seem to be dancing spikes, towers and so forth. This type of mirage is also called the Fata Morgana.
Superior images can be straight up or upside down, depending on the distance of the true object. Oftenthe image appears as a distorted mixture of up and down parts...but the object imaged is indeed stillthere. The interesting thing about superior mirage images is that due to the curvature of the earth light rays can travel large distances, perhaps even from beyond the horizon.
This was observed for the first time in 1596, when a ship under the command of Willem Barents lookingfor the Northeast Passage got stuck in the ice at Novaya Zemlya and the crew had to endure the polar winter there. They saw their midwinter night ending with the rise of a distorted sun about 2 weeks earlier than expected. The inversion layer must have just the right temperature gradient to make this possible. In the same way ships which are in reality so far away that they should not have been visible above the
geometric horizon, may appear on the horizon, or even above the horizon as superior mirages. This may explain some stories about flying ships or coastal cities in the sky, as described by some polar explorers. I experience this phenomenon quite regularly myself in Oklahoma where I see the town I am
traveling to, being fifteen miles away, floating above the horizon and appearing as close as just over the next rise.
Thus it is not the case, regularly, that a mirage is something that is not there. Indeed in the superior mirages the object awaits apprehension. The town I’m traveling to always get reached…only later than it
appeared I would. The flying ship always descends and delivers its goods at the port from which it was anticipated and at times are seen before the actually break the horizon.
Images of real objects whether perceived as topsy-turvy at times or just out of reach when the distance is greater than anticipated…these objects eventually can be experienced as true and present when the space between subject and object is finally closed.
Even the pie-in-the-sky quip should not be too quickly dismissed as an inferior mirage…rather a superior imaged dessert that is really there to be served up at a designated appointment a little ways away. It might even be a candidate for one of the mysteriously powerful ironies sought for by another member here.
Ergo…once again…the quintessential analogy is once again employed by the ole Burrr. I sure hope it will not be required to explain the use of every nuance of usage…I’ve got chores to do. See...wasn't that
nice of me?
With all humilité,
Burrr

Yep Buttcrack still spinning the same BS after 2 years.
The only quintessencial analogy in that entire post is that its nothing more than BS spun to keep the cheerleaders confused.
Buttcrack dedicates his life to utter crap.
Can't expect anything more from someone who hasn't been out from under his rock in decades. Throw his thesaurus away and the man is dull as shi.t

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I experience this phenomenon quite regularly myself in Oklahoma where I see the town I am traveling to, being fifteen miles away, floating above the horizon and appearing as close as just over the next rise.

Oklahoma??? ...now ain't that yr typical a.rse end of the world.
No wonder the man's still stuck in a time warp.

Huntercute
Location:
Tuesday, 19. August 2008 06:51
hi guys, i need a puplic explanation from PG and Topcat why they didnt inform me of the new chat and why they made it illigeall to come to this chat,they have abused the trust o me and manny other members even there where given administarative rights, have you guys lost the objective to support SI members and got side tracked in a powerstrugle or was that your objective in the first place i demand a explanation in puplic from you, and dont come me with securety issues-copy and paste is what everyone can do-its about trust you broken this trust big time.

Hohohohohohohohohoho! ROFLMAO.
Poor Hunter got used and abused. Surprised? Not!
And these mushies think they can hide in their new chat room.
Man oh man they're so dellusional its not even funny.
The lengths that some people will go to mislead the few remaining cherries.

"Sito
Joined: 03 Aug 2006
Posts: 304
Interesting post at PF forum
Very interesting post made today by the Powergroup forum admin. Check it out..

Note: Everyone who is an "interested" member should really be checking that forum daily anyway, but sometimes this is difficult to do, so I will try to post here to remind SI members here, to go and check that forum when in my estimation, there seems to be a post of greater importance than just a 'daily update' that really doesnt say much other than something like "we are making progress", or "it will be soon", etc...... "


Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw... Very interesting post? Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw...
Greater importance? Naaaaaw... cute!

Sito @ PG, trying to make commercial in diffrent forums. Has PG lost most of their members?

Naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaw....

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I think everyone who posted there got banned.

I got banned after two posts and never even said one bad thing @@

I don't even think Shoutsh(T is enough of a fanatic to go there

Yep they've hit the pinnacle of paranoia.
Heard they banned a whole lot of people for no apparent reason and the funny part is they banned the WRONG people. ROFL.
Objective achieved.
The tighter they squeeze the more slips through their fingers.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Bla,bla,bla,bla,bla,bla............This is supreme Bull****, elaborated and eloquent, but still Bull****:


Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:31 pm Post subject:
gcark wrote:
I'm disapointed that Senior members whould act this way. Like you Burroak, you call the guy a troll, then the very next statement out of your mouth, about mirages, is in agreement with the guy??!! I don't think it would hurt to be a little more understanding!!
24carat wrote:
A mirage....not a good analogy, Burr. Mirages disappear as one gets closer. I'll leave it to you to come up with something more appropriate; my brain is tired tonight.24c
Not a problem 24...let me help you and gcark out a bit.
A mirage is a naturally-occurring optical phenomenon, in which light rays are bent to produce a displaced image of distant objects or the sky.
The etymology is traced back to the Latin, mirare…meaning to appear…to seem…and is the same root with which we derive mirror. The two types of mirages are termed Inferior and Superior and which one you may experience has to do with the atmospheric conditions.
Instances of inferior mirages are common such as when light refracts sky and appears as pools that aren’t there. The water is actually an image of a thing that is actually elsewhere (the sky). This inferior mirage is also commonly experience as a road mirage. That said…it is not the use of mirage purposed in
my comment...and second guessing my choice is premature.
I reference the mirage phenomenon of the superior image. It is witnessed in the presence of a temperature inversion when the upper atmosphere is warmer than the air near the ground. In the case
of the superior mirage the image indeed mirrors the actual object but in such a way as making distances from the observer to the object difficult to calculate.
An example of a superior mirage would be a distant shoreline made towering, looking higher…thus perhaps closer…than it is in reality, but because of the turbulences there seem to be dancing spikes, towers and so forth. This type of mirage is also called the Fata Morgana.
Superior images can be straight up or upside down, depending on the distance of the true object. Oftenthe image appears as a distorted mixture of up and down parts...but the object imaged is indeed stillthere. The interesting thing about superior mirage images is that due to the curvature of the earth light rays can travel large distances, perhaps even from beyond the horizon.
This was observed for the first time in 1596, when a ship under the command of Willem Barents lookingfor the Northeast Passage got stuck in the ice at Novaya Zemlya and the crew had to endure the polar winter there. They saw their midwinter night ending with the rise of a distorted sun about 2 weeks earlier than expected. The inversion layer must have just the right temperature gradient to make this possible. In the same way ships which are in reality so far away that they should not have been visible above the
geometric horizon, may appear on the horizon, or even above the horizon as superior mirages. This may explain some stories about flying ships or coastal cities in the sky, as described by some polar explorers. I experience this phenomenon quite regularly myself in Oklahoma where I see the town I am
traveling to, being fifteen miles away, floating above the horizon and appearing as close as just over the next rise.
Thus it is not the case, regularly, that a mirage is something that is not there. Indeed in the superior mirages the object awaits apprehension. The town I’m traveling to always get reached…only later than it
appeared I would. The flying ship always descends and delivers its goods at the port from which it was anticipated and at times are seen before the actually break the horizon.
Images of real objects whether perceived as topsy-turvy at times or just out of reach when the distance is greater than anticipated…these objects eventually can be experienced as true and present when the space between subject and object is finally closed.
Even the pie-in-the-sky quip should not be too quickly dismissed as an inferior mirage…rather a superior imaged dessert that is really there to be served up at a designated appointment a little ways away. It might even be a candidate for one of the mysteriously powerful ironies sought for by another member here.
Ergo…once again…the quintessential analogy is once again employed by the ole Burrr. I sure hope it will not be required to explain the use of every nuance of usage…I’ve got chores to do. See...wasn't that
nice of me?
With all humilité,
Burrr

HEY, CHECK IT OUT, the gcark guy is going toe to toe withe BURROAZZ and tellin like it is on the php. Someone goin to get banned....lol.../.

GET IT B4 IT"S DELETED....lol.........


gcark

Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:53 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry Burroak, I forgot, YOUR ALLWAYS RIGHT !!


Burroak
Active Member


Joined: 13 Aug 2006
Posts: 396

Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 5:14 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

gcark wrote:
Sorry Burroak, I forgot, YOUR ALLWAYS RIGHT !!


Hurts...don't it...?

This isn't your only sign-in name here...is it gcark?



gcark
New Member


Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 41

Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 8:07 am Post subject:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If Anyone ever entered this forum and deserved to be called a Troll, it is you. Being pompass and re-quoting your trash talk to suit your own needs fulfills nothing. If anyone here has multiple sign-in names it's probuly you ....because ONE username CERTAINLY isn't enough to satisfy your unduly OVERINFLATED EGO !!