"In-the-knows" have painted themselves into a corner

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Check out the date when the site was last modfied and you will have all your answers.
As soon as this information became public, details were removed the very next day.
I have confirmation from my own investigations that TopCat IS feline and she is not US born either.
If YOU want more reliable information, it will cost you.

WAIT, hold on and be real..... the quote poster must not be a natural English speaker since TopCat can't possibly be Feline, TopCat is most assuredly HUMAN - I have absolute proof of this fact. Now female, if that is what the poster means, is also not true, so the poster is either a liar, a fraud or an idiot. I have no idea what being US born has to do with anything unless HE is planning to run for president and to my knowledge he isn't named Barack or John. (and since he isn't female we don't need to discuss the Hillary word). So Mr. Unregistered, (and it was forbe2 who originally outed this whois info that wasn't even correct then) your investigation isn't worth a 3 dollar bill....or in the US, an Eliot Spitzer endorsement.

pingman
Administrator


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 670

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 5:49 pm Post subject: WE ARE VERY FORTUNATE

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We are very fortunate because of the following:

1. We invested in a program administered by an honest man, Sam Colins.

2. The parent company took control of solid Investment.

3. Other than Mr. Colins, it appears some members of the parent company refused to make payouts to online investors.

4. Because of this apparent refusal, German investors filed civil and criminal charges against the parent company.

5. In order to get the criminal charges dismissed, the parent company agreed to a negotiated settlement.

6. For security, part of the negotiated settlement stipulated that all online investor funds be deposited in escrow accounts controlled by the German authorities.

7. We have a distinguished jurist who is administering the payouts in an honest and forthright manner.

8. We have the support of our fellow investors and of the international banking industry in general.

9. We are involved in a program that yields fantastic profits.

In my opinion, there must be some kind of divine master plan or all of this would not have happened the way it did.

1. There was and is no 'Sam Colins' other than a contrived Western-sounding name the same as used in most other HYIP scams. If you dispute this, then show *any* evidence that he exists.

2. There was and is no 'parent company' for SI. You don't have parent companies for HYIP scams. If you dispute this, then show *any* evidence that either SI or a related parent company existed or continues to exist. Furthermore, it's apparent that in the case that there truly were a subsidiary and parent company relationship, then there would be no need for a 'parent company' to 'take over' anything since they already would be in such a controlling position. Once again Pingman shows a basic misunderstanding of fact underlying his story demonstrating that it cannot be true.

3. In light of 1. and 2. above, 3. cannot be true.

4. There is no evidence of and actions in any German court nor the existence of any of these 'German investors.' If you dispute this, then show *any* evidence supporting this assertion.

5. Civil and criminal actions are separate and distinct. If criminal charges were filed, then they would not then be 'dismissed' as a result of a civil settlement. Furthermore, all of these actions would be public information. No public records pertaining to any of this can be found indicating that none of this is true. If you dispute this, then provide *any* evidence supporting this assertion

6. In light of 4. and 5. above, 6. cannot be true. Furthermore, 'escrow' accounts would not be the mechanism used in such a case. Specifically not accounts in another country as has been suggested. Once again Pingman shows a basic misunderstanding of fact underlying his story demonstrating that it cannot be true.

7. In light of 4. and 5. above, 7. cannot be true. Also, the identity of any judge issuing such orders would be public and there would be no need for obfuscation. Furthermore, a 'distinguished jurist' would not be the party administering payouts in such cases. Once again Pingman shows a basic misunderstanding of fact underlying his story demonstrating that it cannot be true.

8. None of these 'fellow investors' are apparent anywhere other than through alleged contacts by the in-the-knows.

9. The only 'fantastic profits yielded' were for the several of individuals who stole money via this scam.

The reality is that *nothing* has happened beyond another typical HYIP scam ending in the inevitable manner. If there were some 'divine master plan' then it's it most ineffective ever.

Whoa whoa whoa.....

Don't be posting these updates here in this forum.
I don't care what you have to say, pro or con. It
is just not right for you to post this. What gives
you the right to come here and potentially ruin
months and months of work?

Stay out and don't post anything.

Yeh!! BE careful!! MAYBE the judge will listen to you and not follow the law!!!

Yeah the whole deal is ruined now! The gag order has been violated! The anonymous German judge is going to be so pissed! LOL!

Breaks me up that some of you dummies actually believe Pingman's brain farts.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

1. There was and is no 'Sam Colins' other than a contrived Western-sounding name the same as used in most other HYIP scams. If you dispute this, then show *any* evidence that he exists.

2. There was and is no 'parent company' for SI. You don't have parent companies for HYIP scams. If you dispute this, then show *any* evidence that either SI or a related parent company existed or continues to exist. Furthermore, it's apparent that in the case that there truly were a subsidiary and parent company relationship, then there would be no need for a 'parent company' to 'take over' anything since they already would be in such a controlling position. Once again Pingman shows a basic misunderstanding of fact underlying his story demonstrating that it cannot be true.

3. In light of 1. and 2. above, 3. cannot be true.

4. There is no evidence of and actions in any German court nor the existence of any of these 'German investors.' If you dispute this, then show *any* evidence supporting this assertion.

5. Civil and criminal actions are separate and distinct. If criminal charges were filed, then they would not then be 'dismissed' as a result of a civil settlement. Furthermore, all of these actions would be public information. No public records pertaining to any of this can be found indicating that none of this is true. If you dispute this, then provide *any* evidence supporting this assertion

6. In light of 4. and 5. above, 6. cannot be true. Furthermore, 'escrow' accounts would not be the mechanism used in such a case. Specifically not accounts in another country as has been suggested. Once again Pingman shows a basic misunderstanding of fact underlying his story demonstrating that it cannot be true.

7. In light of 4. and 5. above, 7. cannot be true. Also, the identity of any judge issuing such orders would be public and there would be no need for obfuscation. Furthermore, a 'distinguished jurist' would not be the party administering payouts in such cases. Once again Pingman shows a basic misunderstanding of fact underlying his story demonstrating that it cannot be true.

8. None of these 'fellow investors' are apparent anywhere other than through alleged contacts by the in-the-knows.

9. The only 'fantastic profits yielded' were for the several of individuals who stole money via this scam.

The reality is that *nothing* has happened beyond another typical HYIP scam ending in the inevitable manner. If there were some 'divine master plan' then it's it most ineffective ever.

Brilliant! It's incredible how you have it all figured out! I guess that finally settles it and we can now all go home.

Crow a la orange

Crow Fricassee

Crowquettes


Yummy -- recipes available on request!!! Bet you'll be needing them

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Crow a la orange

Crow Fricassee

Crowquettes


Yummy -- recipes available on request!!! Bet you'll be needing them

Bet I won't. Already lots of previous failed crow predictions for you to chew on while you wait for something that will never happen. Enjoy.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Bet I won't. Already lots of previous failed crow predictions for you to chew on while you wait for something that will never happen. Enjoy.

Yes a lot of pie to eat after all those useless predictions.Lol

Whoa!!! Lemmings eat pie too????