Performance bonus

This is a discussion on Performance bonus within the Salary & Workers Compensation forum, part of the LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW category; I was a part of senior management of a South African company and was given the company’s highest rating at ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 4.00 average. Display Modes
Old Aug 30th, 2007, 02:34 PM   #1
Unregistered
Guest
 

Unregistered's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a

Angry Performance bonus

I was a part of senior management of a South African company and was given the company’s highest rating at an annual performance appraisal and compensated with a $100,000 performance bonus as well as a salary increase of 20%. The letter stated as follows: “Your hard work, dedication and loyalty are herewith acknowledged and you are similarly thanked therefore. As a most valued employee it was further decided to reward you with a performance bonus of $100,000 as well as a salary increase of 20.00%...”

In the same letter the company stated that I will be liable to pay the said $100,000 back in the event that I resign within 1 year from the date of the letter. Unfortunately I resigned after five months from the date of the letter.

The company has now filed a motion in the local High Court for me to pay the $100,000 dollars back.

Although I know that the company stated that I will be liable to pay the money back if I resigned within 1 year, I never thought (or rather believe) that such a condition can be enforceable. Mainly, because I believe, and maintain, that the performance bonus was paid for past performance. Also, there was no written agreement between me and the company for the repayment of the said bonus – the repayment condition was just stated within the performance appraisal letter. For instance, I was not asked to sign the letter as an acknowledgement of the condition.

I’m about the file a motion to defend myself but would first like to get some opinions from labour or contract law practitioners. Please advice?

Questions:

1. Can a company include such a condition for past performance?
2. Can such a condition be enforceable and accepted by any competent court of law?
3. In the worst case scenario where such a condition is enforceable and the company is right, what amount should I repay? $100,000? Or a portion of it? What portion and why?
  Reply With Quote
Old Aug 31st, 2007, 08:59 AM   #2
Unregistered
Guest
 

Unregistered's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a

Exclamation Re: Performance bonus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I was a part of senior management of a South African company and was given the company’s highest rating at an annual performance appraisal and compensated with a $100,000 performance bonus as well as a salary increase of 20%. The letter stated as follows: “Your hard work, dedication and loyalty are herewith acknowledged and you are similarly thanked therefore. As a most valued employee it was further decided to reward you with a performance bonus of $100,000 as well as a salary increase of 20.00%...”

In the same letter the company stated that I will be liable to pay the said $100,000 back in the event that I resign within 1 year from the date of the letter. Unfortunately I resigned after five months from the date of the letter.

The company has now filed a motion in the local High Court for me to pay the $100,000 dollars back.


Contact me at 082 569 41 98 if you need professional advice. Marius

Although I know that the company stated that I will be liable to pay the money back if I resigned within 1 year, I never thought (or rather believe) that such a condition can be enforceable. Mainly, because I believe, and maintain, that the performance bonus was paid for past performance. Also, there was no written agreement between me and the company for the repayment of the said bonus – the repayment condition was just stated within the performance appraisal letter. For instance, I was not asked to sign the letter as an acknowledgement of the condition.

I’m about the file a motion to defend myself but would first like to get some opinions from labour or contract law practitioners. Please advice?

Questions:

1. Can a company include such a condition for past performance?
2. Can such a condition be enforceable and accepted by any competent court of law?
3. In the worst case scenario where such a condition is enforceable and the company is right, what amount should I repay? $100,000? Or a portion of it? What portion and why?
Pleas contact me at 082 569 4198 for professional advice. Marius
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share

Tags
None

This thread has 1 reply and has been viewed 1234 times

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The AIG Bonus Furor, Take II: A Ride Through the Webosphere WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Mar 17th, 2009 10:50 AM
Performance On Bonus gillberk Off Topic Messages 0 Nov 22nd, 2008 12:59 AM
bonus wages Wayne Daniels Salary & Workers Compensation 1 Jun 26th, 2008 08:36 PM
Re-Paying sign-on bonus? Unregistered Salary & Workers Compensation 0 May 24th, 2008 05:41 PM
Empolyer wants bonus returned Unregistered Other Labor Law Matters 3 Nov 7th, 2007 05:48 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.