Performance bonus
I was a part of senior management of a South African company and was given the companys highest rating at an annual performance appraisal and compensated with a $100,000 performance bonus as well as a salary increase of 20%. The letter stated as follows: Your hard work, dedication and loyalty are herewith acknowledged and you are similarly thanked therefore. As a most valued employee it was further decided to reward you with a performance bonus of $100,000 as well as a salary increase of 20.00%...
In the same letter the company stated that I will be liable to pay the said $100,000 back in the event that I resign within 1 year from the date of the letter. Unfortunately I resigned after five months from the date of the letter.
The company has now filed a motion in the local High Court for me to pay the $100,000 dollars back.
Although I know that the company stated that I will be liable to pay the money back if I resigned within 1 year, I never thought (or rather believe) that such a condition can be enforceable. Mainly, because I believe, and maintain, that the performance bonus was paid for past performance. Also, there was no written agreement between me and the company for the repayment of the said bonus the repayment condition was just stated within the performance appraisal letter. For instance, I was not asked to sign the letter as an acknowledgement of the condition.
Im about the file a motion to defend myself but would first like to get some opinions from labour or contract law practitioners. Please advice?
Questions:
1. Can a company include such a condition for past performance?
2. Can such a condition be enforceable and accepted by any competent court of law?
3. In the worst case scenario where such a condition is enforceable and the company is right, what amount should I repay? $100,000? Or a portion of it? What portion and why?
|