![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Rating:
|
Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Last Online:
11-11-2008 08:39 AM Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1
|
Hello
Can someone fraudulently remove 95% of the schedule on a deed of sale by making a photocopy of the deed and eliminating three of the four boundaries of the schedule off the deed after realizing that their questionable purchase was premature and that CAVEAT EMPTOR was in effect? That person has a schedule and specific delineation on their deed long before the land was probated, surveyed or partitioned into a Block & Parcel. Can that fraudulent person claim another section of land that is not theirs or on their schedule, but which actually belongs to someone else who inherited the land which they have always lived on for over 74 years, but who was unable to claim or survey their land because of that fraudulent claim, but has a VESTING DEED which represents that inheritance? Is a person who bought land that he or she had absolutely no idea how much of it existed, it's location and amount, plus it's legality under law regarding it's true ownership, responsible for their actions? Can a person face CAVEAT EMPTOR ( let the buyer beware, at time of purchase) for specific delineation, specific shedule plus exact quantity of land purchased on paper if they cannot find it because someone else may have sold it? Can an Executrix legally conduct a survey of property she has fully and finally VESTED to a legatee five to six months which was long after her legal duties were over? The collusion between the fraudulent person and the Executrix was marked by that survey which was commissioned by the Executrix of property belonging to the Testator's sole legatee long after her legal duties were over in order for the fraudulent person to claim land that wasn't his illegally. Can someone claim a purchase and title of land from the wrong document, especially when that document was superseded ( "take the place of, succeed or supplant, make obsolete" by a new document representing the property under the law? Is there a legal difference between a VESTING ASSENT in favour of and a DESIGNATION and VESTING DEED, especially when the VESTING DEED superseded ( "take the place of, succeed or supplant, make obsolete"the VESTING ASSENT by 360 days after? To sum up my questions: Does a superseded document takes precedent over a previous document regarding the same property? Can someone fraudulently remove a schedule from a deed in order to claim land somewhere else? Can someone take and claim land wherever they want even though there's a specific schedule on their deed? What is the absolute legality of a schedule, delineation etc etc. The content of this questionaire deserves legal answers because the questions exists. Thank you to whoever may be able to help me. I'll be forever grateful. count of montecristo Last edited by count of montecristo : 04-02-2008 at 03:53 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Top Level Member
Last Online:
07-11-2008 12:49 PM Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 694
|
[Can someone fraudulently remove a schedule from a deed in order to claim land somewhere else]
...it seems you have answered your own question, nobody can take fraudulent acts. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
Modern-day Land thieves on the Island of St. Lucia:
The following is my recollection of what transpired and personal experiences during our stay on the beautiful Island of St. Lucia Two of my colleagues and I flew down to your island on June 16, 2008, after receiving information from reputable and confidential sources in Washington DC, with firsthand knowledge of what appears to be systematic patterns of fraudulent land stealing scams, by several persons in conjunction with a handful of sleazy lawyers, supported by corrupt land registry employees and members of your islands judiciary. The objective of our trip was to interview several parties who apparently had fallen victim to two known con artists, Peter Leroy John and his brother Leo Winston John, from the village of La Croix Chaubourg/ Babonneau. We spoke to several persons who were quite knowledgeable to the John brothers scam, and in fact we made several attempts to interview the Johns on June 17, to no avail. On June 18 2008, we attempted again to make contact with Mr.Peter Leroy John and he agreed to meet with us at his residence that afternoon. Upon arrival, we were asked to wait outside by a young lady who said her father would join us shortly. To our surprise, two black men wearing military style camouflage, exited Mr. Johns residence and walked toward us in an intimidating and confrontational manner. One of the men wearing dark sunglasses with no name tag on his uniform, told us he was with the police and was here to warn us about interfering with issues that was not our concern and we should leave the island immediately if we did not want to end up sleeping with the fish. He demanded to see our passports which we told him had been accidently left at the hotel. He threatened us with arrests if we did not leave the island within 24 hours. Based on the information we were able to gather during our short stay on that lovely island, we are convinced that this story warrants an in depth investigation to expose what appears to be a well organized gang of land swindlers operating with complete impunity from the islands criminal justice system |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
A Professional fraudsters goal in life is to use their knowledge to steal from individuals who rely on their help and advice. If you get ripped off by a St. Lucian Lawyer, you will not get justice within the St, Lucian legal systems. The system has been strategically designed to automatically cover up for them.
These same legal professional crooks are some times members of Freemasons or Lodge as its called on St. Lucia. Depending on your point of view freemasonry is either a gentlemen's club devoted to moral and spiritual values or a corrupt organization intent on looking after number one. Masonic/Lodge rules state that members must do all they can to support each other, to took after each other and to keep each others affairs secrets. Most Freemasons are not corrupt; they are the innocent cover for an organization whose true motivation they know nothing about. The Freemasonic networks are one of the key parts of the Illuminati web and there is no doubt that Freemasonic policemen, judges, and criminals do work together to stop justice being done. Indeed such incidents have come to light publicly from time to time, but mostly they remain hidden. Surely, when you have the power to put people in jail and destroy their lives, as do the police, lawyers, and judges, it should be compulsory to make public the fact that you are a member of a secret society. So it should for government ministers and their civil servants. It's only right and fair, but since when did that mean anything in the corrupt world of politics, police, and the `justice' system? Like in the UK no legislation has been introduced in St. Lucia parliament to force freemasons holding public office to declare their membership. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
St. Lucian lawyer Callistus Vern Gill, operating in juxtaposition with two well know scam artist Peter Leroy John and Brother Leo Winston John, are suspected of forging land documents and signatures, then present such documents in St. Lucia courts as legally binding bill of sale, in order to acquire land legally owned by four generations of families.
Internet Scam Artists - Prevent Identity Theft - Is It A Scam?: UK e-Lottery Promotion Scam |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Posts: n/a
|
St. Lucian lawyer Callistus Vern Gill, operating in juxtaposition with two well know scam artist Peter Leroy John and Brother Leo Winston John, are suspected of forging land documents and signatures, then present such documents in St. Lucia courts as legally binding bill of sale, in order to acquire land legally owned by four generations of families.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Divorce: Ancillary Matters - Division of Matrimonial Assets | Unregistered | Other Family Law Matters | 2 | 05-06-2008 10:08 PM |
| Sexual rights/matters | Unregistered01 | Other Family Law Matters | 5 | 08-12-2007 01:01 PM |
| private loan matters | spare1 | Miscellaneous Topics | 2 | 07-07-2007 12:07 PM |
| St Lucia Corruption | Unregistered | International Law Issues | 1 | 01-13-2007 02:07 PM |
| fraudulent conveyance? | knight | Debt Collection | 2 | 10-05-2006 08:18 AM |