Bear Hug? Jury to Get Fraud Case Soon

This is a discussion on Bear Hug? Jury to Get Fraud Case Soon within the Money Frauds and Scams forum, part of the OTHER TOPICS OF INTEREST category; With all the bustling around Thursday on the blockbuster Galleon hedge-fund news, one could almost be forgiven for forgetting about ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 6th, 2009, 09:10 AM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default Bear Hug? Jury to Get Fraud Case Soon



With all the bustling around Thursday on the blockbuster Galleon hedge-fund news, one could almost be forgiven for forgetting about the other big hedge-funders in trouble — the Bear Stearns duo currently in the midst of their fraud trial over in Brooklyn.

The NYT has a report out Friday on how just how things are shaping up over there. According to the story, federal prosecutors spent nearly three hours on Thursday things up with their closing remarks. The gist of the argument is simple: the pair, Ralph Cioffi and Matthew Tannin (pictured) knew their funds were in trouble in the spring of 2007 and had lied to investors.

“If you are trusted with other people’s money on Wall Street, you can’t defraud them,” said AUSA Ilene Jaroslaw, to the jury. Cioffi and Tannin acted like “masters of the universe” and “thought the laws and rules applied to everyone else but them,” she added. Click here for earlier LB coverage of the Bear Stearns trial.

The case is the first against prominent Wall Street executives charged with fraud stemming from the financial crisis. But it hasn’t gone entirely well for the government. Government evidence has been ruled in admissible; government witnesses have provided testimony not entirely helpful to the government’s case.

Much of the government’s case has focused on emails sent by the defendants. But Williams & Connolly’s Dane Butswinkas, Cioffi’s main lawyer, said prosecutors have taken the e-mail out of context and provided “misleading sound bites” to try to prove a criminal conspiracy when there was none. According to the NYT, Butswinkas said the details of the strategies used by the two hedge funds run by the men and the context of the communications from Cioffi and Tannin raised doubts about the prosecution’s case.

“If you look at some of the tactics I just showed you, do they make you pause?” Mr. Butswinkas asked the jury. “If they would, then that’s reasonable doubt.” Butswinkas is expected to continue his closing remarks on Friday followed by a statement by Tannin’s lawyers. The case would then head to the jury.

On Thursday, reports the Times, Cioffi “seemed confident he would be exonerated as he chatted with family members and friends before closing statements.”





WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Child’s Teddy Bear Used as Ploy in Nasty Divorce Case WSJ_law_blog Child Custody & Support 3 Oct 28th, 2009 01:44 PM
In Setback For Bear Stearns Case, Judge Suppresses Email WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 26th, 2009 04:40 PM
Shots Fired in Bear Stearns Case; Spotlight Shifts to Defense Counsel WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 1st, 2009 07:30 PM
Trial Ends in Jefferson Case; Jury to Get Case Thursday WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Jul 29th, 2009 07:30 PM
The Indictment in the Bear Stearns Fund Manager Case WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Jun 19th, 2008 11:50 AM


Top crime attorneys


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 AM.