WORLD Law Direct Forums
Home > WORLD Law Direct Forums > OTHER LEGAL ISSUES > Miscellaneous Topics > Surrogacy Agreement, Medical Technology & the Law: On the Rights of Surrogate Mothers

Surrogacy Agreement, Medical Technology & the Law: On the Rights of Surrogate Mothers

This is a discussion on Surrogacy Agreement, Medical Technology & the Law: On the Rights of Surrogate Mothers within the Miscellaneous Topics forum, part of the OTHER LEGAL ISSUES category; If technology is a messy child ambling through a room, the law is an anxious parent walking two paces behind, ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply  POST NEW QUESTION

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 15th, 2010, 11:20 AM   #1
News
 
WSJ Law Blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,163

Default Surrogacy Agreement, Medical Technology & the Law: On the Rights of Surrogate Mothers



If technology is a messy child ambling through a room, the law is an anxious parent walking two paces behind, trying to clean up the debris.

We thought up that metaphor just now (it’s not perfect, but ain’t bad) upon reading Nathan Koppel’s story today in the WSJ on surrogacy and the law.

Medical advances have in recent years made it possible for a woman to carry an embryo from donated eggs and sperm as an (often paid) service to a gay couples or couples unable to bear children. But does a surrogate mother have rights to the children after giving birth?

The situation arose with a gay couple in New Jersey, Donald Robinson Hollingsworth (pictured, right) and Sean Hollingsworth (pictured, left), a few years ago.

The Hollingsworths contracted with a woman to carry an embryo from donated eggs and sperm from Sean Hollingsworth. The surrogate mother, Donald Hollingsworth’s sister Angelia Robinson, gave birth to twins in 2006.

Although Robinson had signed a pre-birth agreement indicating she would relinquish her parental rights, she later sued after deciding she wanted to help raise the twins. In December, New Jersey state Judge Francis Schultz ruled that Robinson is a parent.

Critics say surrogacy often exploits impoverished and relatively unsophisticated women, who are enticed by hefty fees into relinquishing their parental rights. Proponents counter that surrogacy agreements usually are struck by consenting, informed adults, who are in a better position than courts or legislators to determine the best interests of a child.

Surrogacy remains a relatively uncommon pathway to parenthood, in part because it still rests on a somewhat shaky legal ground in parts of the country. Eight states have passed laws prohibiting some or all surrogacy contracts, while courts in other states have refused to enforce such contracts.

A few states, including New Hampshire, strike a legal middle ground: They allow surrogacy, but grant surrogates a period of time after birth—generally, a few days— to change their minds about whether to relinquish their parental rights. Other safeguards adopted by states include requirements that surrogate mothers undergo counseling and have had at least one prior delivery.

States, at a minimum, should establish clear guidelines, says Jessica Arons, a reproductive-rights expert at the Center for American Progress. “You don’t want a determination of who will raise a child and where the child will be living to be left in legal limbo.”

Photo: Chris Hietikko





WSJ Law Blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share

Tags
donated eggs, donated sperm, parental rights, pre-birth agreement, surrogacy contracts, surrogate mother



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I have been scammed by Shenzhen Broad Science & Technology Co., Ltd BESTBUYUNIVERSE Money Frauds and Scams 2 Oct 25th, 2010 11:11 PM
Mothers rights vs Fathers rights Unregistered Child Custody & Support 10 Aug 11th, 2010 06:13 PM
Surrogacy Agreement in Utah courtneylyn Other Family Law Matters 1 Apr 10th, 2009 07:51 PM
Technology & the Law: 2nd Circuit OK’s Cablevision’s DVR System WSJ Law Blog Law News 0 Aug 4th, 2008 07:21 PM
Confidentiality & Intellectual Property Rights & Assignment Agreement Totally Confused Hiring, Firing, Wrongful Termination 0 May 7th, 2008 07:04 PM


International Law Issues?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:06 AM.