"Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell" Law (DADT) to Go?
This is a discussion on "Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell" Law (DADT) to Go? within the Miscellaneous Topics forum, part of the OTHER LEGAL ISSUES category; About the law The law as it currently stands does not prohibit homosexuals from serving in the military as long ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Forum Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,242
|
About the law
The law as it currently stands does not prohibit homosexuals from serving in the military as long as they keep it secret. This has led to an uncomfortable value disconnect as homosexuals serving, estimated to be over 65,000, must compromise personal integrity. Given the growing gap between social mores and the law, DADT may do damage to the very unit cohesion that it seeks to protect. Finally, it has placed commanders in a position where they are expected to know everything about their troops except this one aspect. Is 'don't ask, don't tell' done for? Sixteen years after passage of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law, there is reason to hope that the military is edging away from its destructive opposition to allowing gay men and lesbians to serve openly. At the very least, a prize-winning essay in a prominent military journal suggests that the issue is open to debate and even dissent. Several other countries, including Australia, Canada, Israel and Britain, have lifted bans on homosexuals serving openly with no adverse effects on military performance or readiness. Obama administration Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid wants to hear from the Obama administration on how to overturn the "don't ask, don't tell" ban on gays serving openly in the military. The Democratic-led Congress is considering repealing the 1993 law but isn't expected to act on the issue until early next year. In the meantime, the Nevada Democrat is asking President Barack Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates to share their views and recommendations on the controversial policy. More... Strong Rebuke Of DADT From Inside the Military - The Moderate Voice The Damage of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell - New York Times ![]() In Sept. 24 letters to Obama and Gates, Reid also asked for a review of the cases of two U.S. officers who were discharged from the military because of their sexuality. Don't ask, don't tell term and federal law From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Don't ask, don't tell is the common term for the policy about homosexuality in the U.S. military mandated by federal law Pub.L. 103-160 (10 U.S.C. § 654). Unless one of the exceptions from 10 U.S.C. § 654(b) applies, the policy prohibits anyone who "demonstrate(s) a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts" from serving in the armed forces of the United States, because "it would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability." The act prohibits any homosexual or bisexual person from disclosing his or her sexual orientation or from speaking about any homosexual relationships, including marriages or other familial attributes, while serving in the United States armed forces. The "don't ask" part of the policy indicates that superiors should not initiate investigation of a service member's orientation in the absence of disallowed behaviors, though mere suspicion of homosexual behavior can cause an investigation. More... Don't ask, don't tell - Wikipedia |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
| Tags |
| discharged from military, gay rights |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Indonesia must repeal "cruel" new stoning and caning law | forum_admin | Human Rights | 0 | Sep 17th, 2009 07:11 PM |
| India mothers-in-law fight abuse (harassed for bringing in "inadequate dowry") | forum_admin | Indian Law | 1 | Sep 7th, 2009 03:12 PM |
| Texas new law and the "Less Tears More Years Act" | forum_admin | Law News | 0 | Sep 6th, 2009 06:34 PM |
| Judge was confused as why they were going to "dismiss the charge" and not "nolle" it | Unregistered | Drunk Driving, DUI, DWI | 2 | Jun 19th, 2008 12:38 AM |
| "instructed to advice a willingness to sell": need case law | bardsym | Business Contracts & Partnerships | 1 | May 15th, 2008 02:42 AM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:05 PM.










Linear Mode


