What is Passing Bad Checks (Penal Code § 476(a))

This is a discussion on What is Passing Bad Checks (Penal Code § 476(a)) within the Law Wiki forum, part of the Create Wiki Article category; Passing a bad check is tendering a check for goods or service, from a bank account that has insufficient funds ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply  POST NEW QUESTION

 

Article Tools Search this Article Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average. Display Modes
  #1  

Default What is Passing Bad Checks (Penal Code § 476(a))

Passing a bad check is tendering a check for goods or service, from a bank account that has insufficient funds to pay the full amount of the check. It happens every day, to the tune of millions of dollars in California alone. Even attempting to tender a check with insufficient funds is a crime. The payee does not need to receive the check and attempt to cash or deposit it.

It is a serious offense, one that can be prosecuted as a felony or a misdemeanor (“a wobbler”). The decision of how to charge it depends upon the circumstances of the fraud and the defendant’s prior criminal history.

There is no minimum amount below which a prosecutor is barred from prosecuting someone, however, if the check amount is $450 or less and the individual has no prior conviction for passing bad checks, forgery or petty theft when the conduct was passing bad checks or forgery, the case must be filed as a misdemeanor.

The maximum fine, if the case is filed as a misdemeanor, is $1,000. If the case is filed as a felony and there is a conviction, the judge is permitted to fine defendant up to $10,000 and sentence the individual to up to three years in state prison, although this is rarely done. Such consequences may not be the client’s only concern, however, as the “victim” may file a civil lawsuit as well to recover the loss.

Often, the person tendering the check made a simple oversight. Other times, the intention to defraud is more clear. District Attorneys look for certain tell-tale signs of this by seeing if the check was written on a new account, i.e. the check number is low or even the first check, or the check is written on a closed checking account. Other times, the person writing the check will intentionally make the amount of the check expressed in words not match the handwritten amount in words.

The defenses to a charge of violating Penal Code § 476(a) are rather simple and straight forward. First, there is the defense that you post-dated the check and the person tried to cash or deposit the check prior to the dated indicated on the check.

Next, there is the, “I honestly thought there were sufficient funds available.” This strains credibility unless the client can show that there were $200 dollars in the account when the check was written for $205. Simple good faith that there were sufficient funds usually does not work unless the client has absolutely never bounced a check before. Then the client can defend himself by explaining that what he or she is really “guilty of” is failing to accurately balance her checkbook (when it really mattered).

Third, there is the uncommon defense of “the bank made a mistake.” This is rare, but it should be explored to see if it applies, especially if your bank offers overdraft protection.

Fourth, and very uncommon, is the duress defense. This means someone threatened you with physical injuries or violence if you did not write the check. Economic duress is not such a defense (“I needed the food, so I wrote a check I knew would bounce.”).

Lastly, there is an unfavored defense, but it is that you told the payee that there were insufficient funds in the account and to wait a certain period of time. This is usually looked upon skeptically, unless the warning is in writing and the payee consents in writing (but who would do this?).

Most counties have a “Bad Check Diversion Program” that is typically eight hours long, but which requires you to make full payment to the victim of the insufficient check. “Diversion” means the client is diverted from the normal court process of proceeding toward trial. The client is given “a time out” to enroll in and complete the class. Orange County and Los Angeles County have such a program. Your attorney can arrange for you to enroll in and complete such a program, which usually requires a court order. The program does have an enrollment fee.

This article was written by Greg Hill. He has defended dozens of people accused of passing bad checks in Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside County, as well as DUI’s, domestic violence and drug offenses all over the state of California. He is an attorney in Torrance, California and a former Marine Officer. He is a U.S. Naval Academy graduate (B.S., 1987), Boston University graduate (M.B.A., 1994) and Loyola Law School graduate (J.D., 1998). Visit his firm’s website at Torrance Criminal Defense Lawyer - Long Beach, California Criminal Attorney - San Pedro Crime Lawyer or his firm’s Facebook page at Greg Hill & Associates - Torrance - Local Business | Facebook.


Contributors: Greghilllaw
Created by Greghilllaw, Jul 18th, 2012 at 11:59 AM
Last edited by Greghilllaw, Jul 18th, 2012 at 11:59 AM
0 Comments , 574 Views
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Article Tools Search this Article
Search this Article:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Improper Passing Citation GA Code 40-6-43 Law Abiding Citizen Traffic & Speeding Tickets 4 Jan 17th, 2013 08:24 AM
sec 328 Indian Penal Code Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 1 Dec 1st, 2009 10:25 AM
Singapore Penal code Unregistered Arrests, Searches, Seizures 8 Sep 4th, 2009 08:43 AM
new york penal code 245.01 opticalguru Arrests, Searches, Seizures 1 Oct 16th, 2007 08:17 AM


International Law Issues?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.