Hearsay Rule

This is a discussion on Hearsay Rule within the Law Wiki forum, part of the Create Wiki Article category; Hearsay is the legal term that describes statements made outside of court or other judicial proceedings. Unless one of about ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply  POST NEW QUESTION

 

Article Tools Search this Article Rate Article Display Modes
  #1  

Default Hearsay Rule

Hearsay is the legal term that describes statements made outside of court or other judicial proceedings. Unless one of about thirty exceptions applies, hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States. The Hearsay Rule is an analytic rule of evidence that defines hearsay and provides for both exceptions and exemptions from that rule. There is no all-encompassing definition of hearsay in the United States. However, most evidentiary codes defining hearsay adopt verbatim the rule as laid out in the Federal Rules of Evidence, which generally defines hearsay as a "statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted." Historically, the rule against hearsay is aimed at prohibiting the use of a person's assertion, as equivalent to testimony to the fact asserted, unless the assertor is brought to testify in court where he may be placed under oath and cross-examined.

Hearsey Evidence

Hearsay testimony is secondhand evidence; it is not what the witness knows personally, but what someone else told him or her. Scuttlebutt is an example of hearsay. In general, hearsay may not be admitted in evidence, but there are exceptions. For instance, if the accused is charged with uttering certain words, a witness is permitted to testify that he or she heard the accused speak them.

The following examples illustrate hearsay that is inadmissible:

1. SN Water, the accused, is being tried for desertion. BMC Boate cannot testify that BM3 Christmas told him that SN Water said he (Water) intended to desert.

2. The accused is being tried for larceny of clothes from a locker. A testifies that B told him that she saw the accused leave the space where the locker was located with a bundle of clothes about the same time the clothes were stolen. This testimony from A would not be admissible to prove the facts stated by B.

Neither BMC Boate nor A would be allowed to testify, but the trial counsel could call BM3 Christmas and B as witnesses. The fact that hearsay evidence was given to an officer in the course of an official investigation does not make it admissible. Now let's look at two exceptions to the rules for hearsay evidence: dying declarations and res gestae.


Contributors: forum_admin, sandra
Created by sandra, Jul 12th, 2010 at 01:18 AM
Last edited by forum_admin, Sep 2nd, 2010 at 08:31 PM
0 Comments , 2190 Views
Reply

Bookmark & Share

Tags
evidentiary codes, federal rules of evidence, judicial proceedings, united states



Article Tools Search this Article
Search this Article:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Motion for false statements and hearsay Falo Hiring, Firing, Wrongful Termination 1 Oct 20th, 2010 03:25 PM
Are there grounds for an appeal? (testify on hearsay) ch3r0k33 Trials & Sentencing 1 Jul 11th, 2010 08:17 PM
Hearsay Law, Hearsay Evidence and Drew Peterson Trial forum_admin Courts, Decisions, Appeals 0 Oct 3rd, 2009 07:09 PM
What is considered hearsay in family court? Unregistered Other Family Law Matters 1 Aug 8th, 2008 11:03 PM


International Law Issues?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:04 AM.