Collaborative Practice Divorce

This is a discussion on Collaborative Practice Divorce within the Law Wiki forum, part of the Create Wiki Article category; What Distinguishes a Collaborative Practice Divorce A Collaborative Practice divorce promotes respect between the parties and allows the parties to ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!


Article Tools Search this Article Rate Article Display Modes

Default Collaborative Practice Divorce

What Distinguishes a Collaborative Practice Divorce

A Collaborative Practice divorce promotes respect between the parties and allows the parties to be in control of the process, and not a judge. It allows each parties’ interests to be addressed, as well as the interests of the children.

In a Collaborative Practice divorce, a couple works with a team of collaboratively trained professionals to resolve disputes respectfully, while pledging to stay out of court. When pledging to stay out of court, the parties are able to control the process and outcome instead of the traditional litigation route where a judge decides the issues for a couple.

The parties pledge mutual respect for each other and an open and honest exchange of information between them. Mutual respect is fundamental to the collaborative process. In a traditional litigation style divorce the lack of effective communication between the parties is a critical issue, while the collaborative practice divorce encourages and supports the parties in communicating their interests, concerns, and goals.

When parties agree to not go to court, the result is a process that becomes more open and less adversarial than the traditional litigation divorce. Through enhanced communication, the couples begin to build a stronger foundation for a sounder and more productive relationship after the divorce is completed.

A Collaborative Practice divorce also allows the divorcing couple to manage the costs in a more economical and efficient manner. This process usually is less expensive than traditional litigation, and is completed in a shorter time frame. And, the collaborative process, open discussions, and negotiations are kept private and do not become a matter of public record as in a traditional litigation style divorce.

In conclusion, a Collaborative Practice divorce is more amicable and promotes respect between the parties. It is usually done in a more efficient and economical manner, and maintains privacy for the couple. And, most importantly, it helps build a sound foundation for the couple to deal with each other after the divorce has been completed.

Created by bookmarkingrlh, Oct 22nd, 2008 at 08:26 AM
Last edited by forum_admin, Aug 31st, 2010 at 11:35 PM
0 Comments , 4770 Views

Bookmark & Share

Article Tools Search this Article
Search this Article:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The AM Roundup: Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus WSJ Law Blog Law News 0 Mar 22nd, 2012 06:40 AM
Collaborative Letter Update GovTrack Law News 0 May 2nd, 2009 07:10 PM
MixedInk experiment: A collaborative letter to Congress on H.R. 45 GovTrack Law News 0 Mar 16th, 2009 09:20 AM
California: I am in the "collaborative-mediation" process. Espanaquerida Divorce, Separation, Annulment 0 Feb 19th, 2009 09:25 PM
What Distinguishes a Collaborative Practice Divorce bookmarkingrlh Other Family Law Matters 0 Oct 22nd, 2008 08:29 AM

Forming an off-shore company? We can assist you in forming your company in 40 countries worldwide.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:57 AM.