WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Create Wiki Article > Law Wiki
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law Wiki A collaborative article system where the collective wisdom of WORLDLawDirect members can be shared.

Hung jury

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
 
AddThis Feed Button
 
Article Tools Search this Article Rate Article Display Modes
  #1  

Default Hung jury

A hung jury is a jury that cannot agree upon a verdict after an extended period of deliberation and is deadlocked with irreconcilable differences of opinion.

In the United States, the result is a mistrial, and the case may be retried. Some jurisdictions permit the court to give the jury a so-called Allen charge, inviting the dissenting jurors to re-examine their opinions, as a last ditch effort to prevent the jury from hanging.

Juries in criminal cases are generally required to reach a unanimous verdict, while juries in civil cases typically have to reach some set level of majority consensus short of unanimity. In jurisdictions giving the litigants a choice of jury size (such as between a six-person and twelve-person jury), defense counsel in both civil and criminal cases frequently opt for the larger number of jurors. A hung jury is generally regarded as the next best thing to an acquittal, so the larger size of the jury increases the chances of dissension. A common axiom in criminal cases is that "it takes only one to hang," referring to the fact that, in some cases, a single juror can defeat the necessary unanimity.

One proposal for dealing with the difficulties associated with hung juries has been to introduce majority verdicts. This measure would allow juries to convict defendants without unanimous agreements amongst the jurors. Hence, a 12-member jury that would otherwise be deadlocked at 11 for conviction and 1 against, would be recorded as a guilty verdict for the defendant. The rationale for majority verdicts usually includes arguments involving so-called 'rogue jurors' who unreasonably impede the course of justice. Opponents of the introduction of majority verdicts argue that it undermines public confidence in criminal justice systems and results in a higher number of individuals convicted of crimes they did not commit.



How to Update Wiki

The Law Wiki is still very new and so it's a great time to jump in and start updating it and learning how to use it. You really can't mess anything up, because all revisions are stored and can be rolled back by a moderator, so play away and you can help make this a great resource for WORLDLawDirect visitors.


Contributors: wld_wiki
Created by sandra, May 14th, 2008 at 11:58 AM
Last edited by wld_wiki, May 14th, 2008 at 12:37 PM
0 Comments , 259 Views
 


Article Tools Search this Article
Search this Article:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hung Jury for Last Two Fen-Phen Lawyers WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Jul 3rd, 2008 04:00 PM
Grand jury sandra Law Wiki 0 May 14th, 2008 05:31 AM
jury duty Unregistered Miscellaneous Topics 1 Mar 3rd, 2008 07:25 PM
JURY DUTY Unregistered Miscellaneous Topics 1 Feb 25th, 2008 07:38 PM
Jury Tampering? cleeg Trials & Sentencing 1 Nov 8th, 2006 01:07 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 AM.


Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.