You (and 60,000 Others) Have Taken the LSAT. Now Read This.
This is a discussion on You (and 60,000 Others) Have Taken the LSAT. Now Read This. within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; When I read the news, reported by Above the Law and others on Tuesday, that LSAT applications have soared over ...
POST NEW QUESTION |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,785
|
When I read the news, reported by Above the Law and others on Tuesday, that LSAT applications have soared over the course of the last year, I was forced to get all cross-legged on the floor and practice my Mindfulness exercises. When I resurfaced from my episode of focused breathing, I resolved to show resolve, to not idly by while so many marched off to law school without at least making my most impassioned stand.
Fortunately, I realized that someone else has recently said, in so many words, what I wanted to say. Earlier this month, a publication called the National Jurist contained an essay called “You chose law school for a reason.” (Hat tip: Adjunct Law Prof Blog.) Much of the essay concerns the unwillingness of law schools to provide accurate statistics on their graduates’ employment. But about 2/3 of the way down the post, the author, lawyer and law-career-guru Ursula Furi-Perry, pretty much nails it, in my opinion. She writes: I’ve said this many times before in my books and articles: there are as many reasons to go to law school as there are applicants, but there are some wrong reasons to go.Spot on. In my opinion, these three make up a significant chunk of the reasons behind young 22 -year-olds trundling off to law school en masse, and they’re all misguided. Don’t get me wrong. Law school is absolutely the right move for people of a certain prediliction, namely, those people who really want to practice law for a living. And there are a lot of those folks out there. Yes, there are lots of things you can do with a law degree, but the vast majority of them do, in fact, pursue careers as lawyers. Back when I was applying to law school, the “pre-law” adviser at my undergraduate institution forced me to think if there was anything else I’d rather do than practice law. I told him yes, there was — and I told him what it was — and he very pointedly discouraged me from applying to law school, at least right away. I, driven by a rather overwhelming sense of fear and insecurity and uncertainty and directionlessness, and a sense that what I really wanted to do wasn’t very practical, didn’t take his advice. It was a mistake. That was in the 1990s. Granted, times are tough now, but the stakes are higher too. Tuition is more expensive and even graduates of top-tier schools struggle to get high-paying jobs, let alone graduates from more middling institutions. So, I’d encourage you to ask yourselves, LSAT-takers, is there anything else you’d rather be? Try that first. Law school will always be there. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
«
On Eric Holder's 'Two-Tiered System of Justice'
|
News You Can Use: On Google's Adding Caselaw to 'Scholar'
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LSAT at the Center of Yet Another Disabilities Lawsuit | WSJ Law Blog | Law News | 0 | Jun 2nd, 2011 09:20 AM |
| I have won $1.000.000.00 in British Columbia Lottery Draw | Unregistered | International Law Issues | 11 | Apr 4th, 2011 12:30 PM |
| Is the LSAT Going to Go the Way of the Dodo? | WSJ Law Blog | Law News | 0 | Jan 13th, 2011 10:40 AM |
| We sold some property in Arkansas for 30,000 - it is worth about 125,000 | victoryinjesus | Wills, Trusts, Estates | 2 | Feb 19th, 2008 12:14 PM |
| www.wearwarehouse.com over $5,000, read my story and learn my lesson | Nike seller | Doing Business in China | 2 | Jan 23rd, 2008 12:46 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:11 PM.








Linear Mode


