WORLD Law Direct Forums
Home > WORLD Law Direct Forums > FORUM INFORMATION > Law News > It’s Not Quite ‘Justice Sotomayor’ Yet, But . . .

It’s Not Quite ‘Justice Sotomayor’ Yet, But . . .

This is a discussion on It’s Not Quite ‘Justice Sotomayor’ Yet, But . . . within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; . . . it might as well be. That’s the word from Tom Goldstein (pictured), the co-head of the Supreme ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old May 28th, 2009, 08:30 PM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default It’s Not Quite ‘Justice Sotomayor’ Yet, But . . .



. . . it might as well be. That’s the word from Tom Goldstein (pictured), the co-head of the Supreme Court practice at Akin Gump in Washington and founder of the indispensable Scotusblog. In a post titled “It’s Over,” Goldstein writes with a certainty that literally made us sit up in our chair:
Basically before it ever started, the fight over the confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor is done. She is going to be confirmed by a relatively wide margin and without a substantial, mainstream assault on her credentials or suitability for the bench.

Continues Goldstein:
To be clear at the outset, this is a descriptive point, not a normative one. I’m explaining the political reality, not how the process should go forward. . . . The phase of defining a nominee in the public’s eye now lasts around forty-eight hours. In that time Harriet Miers was pretty much done – finished. By this point, there has been a huge amount of press coverage and opponents have had the opportunity to make their case. It’s a shockingly short period (unfortunately so), but it reflects (a) the ready availability of research materials, and (b) the rapid turn-over of news cycles.

For a nominee like Sonia Sotomayor, that is the life-or-death period. Once the public is comfortable with her suitability, then the irreducible political reality is that there is no serious prospect of vigorously challenging the nation’s first Latina Supreme Court nominee when the President’s party has an overwhelming numerical advantage in the Senate.

There you have it. Of course, Goldstein could be wrong — we’re sure he has been before. But among Gen Xers, Goldstein’s as serious a student of the Court as anyone out there — and we think he’ll probably prove himself right on this one.

For a lighter take on the Supreme Court, you’ve got to check out the Daily Beast’s photo gallery entitled “Sotomayor, The Movie.” It’s hilarious. The idea is simple: find the actor who would play each of the justices in “Sotomayor, The Movie” — still in pre-pre-pre production, from what we hear. Our favorite: David Hyde Pierce as Justice Alito. We’ve looked at that picture four times now, and are still laughing.





WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The AmLaw 100 Firms: Partying Like It’s 1991 WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 29th, 2009 11:40 AM
Stanford to ABC News: ‘I Would Die . . . if It’s a Ponzi Scheme’ WSJ_law_blog Credit Cards, Banking, Securities 0 Apr 6th, 2009 05:50 PM
Law Students, Looking for a Niche? It’s Fun to Work on the FCPA WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Jul 9th, 2008 04:00 PM
It’s My Party, I’ll Invite Who I Want! Or Not WSJ_law_blog Miscellaneous Topics 0 Jul 2nd, 2008 03:21 PM


International Law Issues?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 AM.