US Attorney in Massachusetts: Under Scrutiny and Outta Here
This is a discussion on US Attorney in Massachusetts: Under Scrutiny and Outta Here within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; As LB noted earlier today, it seems that prosecutorial misconduct is the hot topic, thanks in part to Judge Emmet ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438
|
![]() As LB noted earlier today, it seems that prosecutorial misconduct is the hot topic, thanks in part to Judge Emmet Sullivan who decided to take on the prosecutors in the trial of former U.S. Ted Stevens. Judge Sullivan railed that he had “never seen anything approach the mishandling and misconduct I have seen in this case.” But another federal judge has been on the war path in recent months about the same thing. In Boston, U.S. District Judge Mark Wolf is considering sanctions against a prosecutor for withholding evidence that showed a police officer gave questionable testimony about the defendant’s arrest. (See this Boston Globe story.) In a written opinion, the judge also referred to nine recent examples demonstrating what he called “repeated failure to disclose information” by local prosecutors. “The egregious failure of the government to disclose plainly material exculpatory evidence in this case extends a dismal history of intentional and inadvertent violations of the government’s duties to disclose in cases assigned to this court,” wrote Wolf in his 42-page ruling. The judge wrote that in several cases, the misconduct led to mistrials and convictions that were overturned. The U.S. attorney in Boston, Michael Sullivan, (shown left) told the judge in February that only a small fraction of cases contained such mistakes. A spokeswoman for the U.S. attorney declined to comment to the LB. Now comes word via this story in the Globe that Sullivan (the USA, not the judge) intends to resign Sunday and return to private practice. Sullivan, who took the job a week after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, built a well-regarded health care fraud unit. But critics say he could have been more aggressive about prosecuting other kinds of financial fraud. “There’s an opportunity to have a financial services department so that the one whistleblower about [accused swindler Bernard] Madoff who was in Boston wouldn’t have to go to New York to make the complaint,” Alice E. Richmond, a Boston lawyer, told the Globe, referring to the Boston accountant Harry Markopolos. Richmond would like to have Sullivan’s job. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
«
Mistakes By Prosecutors Alive and Well; Few Punished
|
UC Irvine School of Law — More Selective than Yale? Zot!
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shenzhen mayor urges scrutiny of corruption | FT_news | China News | 0 | Jul 27th, 2009 10:00 AM |
| Judge to ARS Plaintiffs: ‘You Already Recovered, Now Get Outta Here’ | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Mar 31st, 2009 10:10 AM |
| Cardinal Mahony to Face Scrutiny Over Sex-Abuse Scandal | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Feb 2nd, 2009 11:20 AM |
| 50 Cent Looking for Big Change Outta Taco Bell | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Jul 23rd, 2008 09:20 PM |
| Can’t Keep Her Outta the Courtroom! Sandra Day Authors 1st Cir. Opinion | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Jul 10th, 2008 12:30 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.









Linear Mode


