WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Nobody Puts Rebecca in the Corner — Dirty Dancing & the Law

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 14th, 2008, 05:10 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640

Default Nobody Puts Rebecca in the Corner — Dirty Dancing & the Law



We’ve covered pole dancing and the law. Now let’s address dirty dancing.

In 2005, an appeals court concluded that a Supreme Court case Dallas v. Stanglin closed the door on Rebecca Willis’s claim that her Depot-dancing was constitutionally protected expressive activity. The Fourth Circuit held:
The Town’s decision to prohibit lewd dancing at the Depot [a dancehall in Marshall, N.C.] is no different from a decision permitting or prohibiting any other conduct at the Depot. Just as the Town can prohibit drinking alcohol or smoking and can require patrons to wear shoes and shirts, the Town can prohibit lewd or otherwise inappropriate dancing, all without running afoul of the First Amendment.
Yet, the appeals court overturned a decision to dismiss Willis’s suit, saying a jury could conclude the town dance hall committee tried to single out Willis and punish her with its decision to ban her for life. Yesterday, the town of Marshall agreed to pay $275,000 for banning Willis, 64, from a community dance hall on allegations her moves were too risqué. Here’s a report from the Citizen-Times.

The town, according to court documents, said that residents complained she danced in a sexually provocative manner, wearing short skirts while “simulating sexual intercourse with her partner.”

One of her attorneys, Jon Sasser, who was reportedly hired by the ACLU, told the Citizen-Times that the size of the settlement shows a win for Willis. But Larry Leake, an attorney for the town, said Marshall’s insurance company advocated the settlement. The town believes it did nothing wrong and would have prevailed in a trial, he said.

Willis said the only thing she regrets is not being able to go to the Depot — not that she would have ever danced there again. As part of the settlement, the ban stays in place. “I wanted my right to go back into that building,” she said.

LB Trivia of the Week: Scenes from Dirty Dancing were filmed in Lake Lure, N.C. about 50 miles from Marshall and its Depot. Do you think they inspired Willis?
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
UK PERSONAL INJURY LAW & WORKERS COMP LAW OF ONTARIO CANADA eve International Law Issues 0 Nov 27th, 2008 08:37 PM
Cherokee puts off vote on renter law targeting illegal immigrants forum_admin Other Real Estate Law Matters 0 Nov 18th, 2008 08:29 PM
Law Blog Swing State Watch: Next Stop — Florida WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Nov 4th, 2008 04:10 PM
Law Blog Swing State Watch: First Stop — Ohio WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Nov 4th, 2008 12:10 PM
Pole-Dancing and the Law: 1st Amendment Collides With Zoning WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Aug 29th, 2008 11:20 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:52 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.