WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Americans Vote “Yay” on Majority of Ballot Initiatives

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 5th, 2008, 12:30 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640

Default Americans Vote “Yay” on Majority of Ballot Initiatives



Of the big statewide ballot initiatives on the table yesterday, California’s Proposition 8 — a measure to ban same-sex marriage — arguably got the most press. (Prop. 8 passed by a margin of about 4%.) WSJ

But voters in states around the country cast ballots on a wide variety of other proposals — 153 to be exact. Overall, 86 measures were approved, 56 were rejected, and 12 are still to be decided, according to the Initiative and Referendum Institute at USC. Let’s get you up to speed on some of the more high-profile items.

Pot at the Polls: Marijuana criminalization/legalization issues were on the ballots in at least two states. In Massachusetts, voters overwhelmingly approved an initiative to decriminalize possession of small amounts of marijuana, making getting caught with less than an ounce of pot punishable by a civil fine of $100. (Boston Globe) Michigan voters favored sanctioning the use of medical marijuana to treat debilitating illness Tuesday, apparently rejecting arguments that doing so would increase crime and juvenile drug use. (Detroit Free-Press) Both the Massachusetts and Michigan initiatives were backed by the Marijuana Policy Project, a group largely financed by Peter B. Lewis, the chairman of automobile insurer Progressive Corp.

Same-Sex Marriage Smackdowns: Aside from California’s, there were a couple other votes on same-sex marriage yesterday. In Arizona, voters approved a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. (Arizona Republic) So did voters in Florida. (Miami Herald)

Affirmative Action in Nebraska, Colorado: Voters in the Cornhusker state approved a constitutional amendment to bar public agencies, such as universities and city governments, from considering race, gender and ethnicity when handing out contracts, hiring employees and awarding scholarships. (Omaha World-Herald) In Colorado, a similar measure was too close to call. (Rocky Mountain News)

Right-to-Die in Washington: Voters in Washington State passed an initiative allowing doctors to prescribe a lethal dose of medication if requested by Washington residents given six months or less to live. The initiative mirrors Oregon’s Death With Dignity Act, which took effect in 1998 and has facilitated 341 deaths in its first decade. (Seattle Post-Intelligencer)

No Tax-a-chussetts?: Not so fast. Voters in Massachusetts defeated an effort to repeal the state’s income tax. (Boston Globe)

Photo: Getty Images
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sen. Stevens to Prosecutor: “There Are No Gifts There Ma’am” WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 17th, 2008 06:40 PM
“He Was a Lawyer. He Had Discipline.” An Associate’s Transformation. . . WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 14th, 2008 05:00 PM
“Writing” versus “Sponsoring”, and who decides what gets a vote? GovTrack Law News 0 Oct 9th, 2008 11:50 AM
“I Love You, You Know,” and More Revelations from the Stevens Trial WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 7th, 2008 09:00 AM
Should You “ContactThem”? A Tempting Scam… Unregistered Money Frauds and Scams 2 Aug 9th, 2008 10:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:17 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.