WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

No Crying Over Spilled Milk: Citi Triumphs Over Parmalat; Wells Wins

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 20th, 2008, 04:00 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640

Default No Crying Over Spilled Milk: Citi Triumphs Over Parmalat; Wells Wins

Wachovia may’ve slipped through Citi’s fingers, but after five long months of trial, the bank can take solace in big, fat jury verdict.



You’ll be forgiven, Law Blog readers, if you don’t remember the Parmalat-Citi trial, so here’s the backdrop:

Parmalat’s CEO, Dr. Enrico Bondi, sued on behalf of Parmalat, claiming that Citi bankers were complicit in the company’s meltdown by helping Parmalat insiders loot the company and conceal off-balance-sheet debt. In 2003, the Italian dairy company collapsed under the weight of an accounting scandal and billions in debt. Bondi’s lawyer, Kenneth Chiate of Quinn Emanuel in L.A., said in his opening statement that the bankers were driven by “greed” and wanted to make “higher bonuses and higher salaries through making loans to a company” — i.e. Parmalat — “that they shouldn’t have been making.” Bondi sued Citi for $2.2 billion. The case was heard in Bergen County Superior Court in New Jersey.

But Citi’s lawyer — Paul Weiss’s Ted Wells — argued that Citi lost more money than any other creditor as a result of the fraud. Wells said the bank made only about $131 million in fees in about nine years of working with Parmalat. The bank had recovered about $330 million it lost due to the fraud, Wells said in his opening. Citi sought $699 million in counterclaims.

Today, Citi recovered more than half what it requested — $364 million. The jury, reports the WSJ, rejected Bondi’s allegations that Citi aided and abetted a breach of fiduciary duty by corrupt Parmalat insiders.

Separately, Bondi is pursuing claims against Bank of America and Grant Thornton in U.S. District Court in Manhattan. The case is expected to go to trial sometime next year. The companies also have denied any wrongdoing.

“We have said from the beginning of this case that we have done nothing wrong,” a Citi spokeswoman said. “Citi was the largest victim of the Parmalat fraud and not part of it.”
Parmalat didn’t immediately have a comment.

Last edited by top_admin : Oct 20th, 2008 at 04:10 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
With the Citi/Wachovia Talks Done, Where Does the Fight Go From Here? WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 9th, 2008 07:00 PM
Parmalat class action Unregistered Class Actions & Defective Products 1 Jun 17th, 2008 04:55 PM
Wells Fargo Financial ShyL8y Consumer Complaints 0 May 22nd, 2008 12:07 PM
Is Wells Fargo trying to scam us? Sonja Consumer Complaints 2 Jan 29th, 2008 11:53 AM
can wells fargo legally do this ihatewellsfargo Consumer Bankruptcy 1 Jan 4th, 2007 06:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:18 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.