No Crying Over Spilled Milk: Citi Triumphs Over Parmalat; Wells Wins
This is a discussion on No Crying Over Spilled Milk: Citi Triumphs Over Parmalat; Wells Wins within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; Wachovia may’ve slipped through Citi’s fingers, but after five long months of trial, the bank can take solace in big, ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,853
|
Wachovia may’ve slipped through Citi’s fingers, but after five long months of trial, the bank can take solace in big, fat jury verdict.
![]() You’ll be forgiven, Law Blog readers, if you don’t remember the Parmalat-Citi trial, so here’s the backdrop: Parmalat’s CEO, Dr. Enrico Bondi, sued on behalf of Parmalat, claiming that Citi bankers were complicit in the company’s meltdown by helping Parmalat insiders loot the company and conceal off-balance-sheet debt. In 2003, the Italian dairy company collapsed under the weight of an accounting scandal and billions in debt. Bondi’s lawyer, Kenneth Chiate of Quinn Emanuel in L.A., said in his opening statement that the bankers were driven by “greed” and wanted to make “higher bonuses and higher salaries through making loans to a company” — i.e. Parmalat — “that they shouldn’t have been making.” Bondi sued Citi for $2.2 billion. The case was heard in Bergen County Superior Court in New Jersey. But Citi’s lawyer — Paul Weiss’s Ted Wells — argued that Citi lost more money than any other creditor as a result of the fraud. Wells said the bank made only about $131 million in fees in about nine years of working with Parmalat. The bank had recovered about $330 million it lost due to the fraud, Wells said in his opening. Citi sought $699 million in counterclaims. Today, Citi recovered more than half what it requested — $364 million. The jury, reports the WSJ, rejected Bondi’s allegations that Citi aided and abetted a breach of fiduciary duty by corrupt Parmalat insiders. Separately, Bondi is pursuing claims against Bank of America and Grant Thornton in U.S. District Court in Manhattan. The case is expected to go to trial sometime next year. The companies also have denied any wrongdoing. “We have said from the beginning of this case that we have done nothing wrong,” a Citi spokeswoman said. “Citi was the largest victim of the Parmalat fraud and not part of it.” Parmalat didn’t immediately have a comment. Last edited by top_admin; Oct 20th, 2008 at 05:10 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
«
Another NYT Article About the McCains, Another D.C. Lawyer
|
On Last Day of Sen. Stevens Testimony, Allegations of Re-Gifting
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fired while Waitressing, spilled water valid? | Unregistered | Hiring, Firing, Wrongful Termination | 5 | Sep 12th, 2009 01:58 PM |
| Crying Calif mom arraigned on murder, rape charges (AP) | Yahoo! News | Crimes and Trials News | 1 | Apr 15th, 2009 02:28 AM |
| In Snyder v. Bronfman, Best Tabloid Suit of 2007, Bronfman Triumphs | WSJ Law Blog | Law News | 0 | Dec 23rd, 2008 10:21 PM |
| Parmalat class action | Unregistered | Class Actions & Defective Products | 1 | Jun 17th, 2008 05:55 PM |
| can wells fargo legally do this | ihatewellsfargo | Consumer Bankruptcy | 1 | Jan 4th, 2007 07:13 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.









Linear Mode


