WORLD Law Direct Forums
Home > WORLD Law Direct Forums > FORUM INFORMATION > Law News > No Crying Over Spilled Milk: Citi Triumphs Over Parmalat; Wells Wins

No Crying Over Spilled Milk: Citi Triumphs Over Parmalat; Wells Wins

This is a discussion on No Crying Over Spilled Milk: Citi Triumphs Over Parmalat; Wells Wins within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; Wachovia may’ve slipped through Citi’s fingers, but after five long months of trial, the bank can take solace in big, ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 20th, 2008, 05:00 PM   #1
News
 
WSJ Law Blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,853

Default No Crying Over Spilled Milk: Citi Triumphs Over Parmalat; Wells Wins

Wachovia may’ve slipped through Citi’s fingers, but after five long months of trial, the bank can take solace in big, fat jury verdict.



You’ll be forgiven, Law Blog readers, if you don’t remember the Parmalat-Citi trial, so here’s the backdrop:

Parmalat’s CEO, Dr. Enrico Bondi, sued on behalf of Parmalat, claiming that Citi bankers were complicit in the company’s meltdown by helping Parmalat insiders loot the company and conceal off-balance-sheet debt. In 2003, the Italian dairy company collapsed under the weight of an accounting scandal and billions in debt. Bondi’s lawyer, Kenneth Chiate of Quinn Emanuel in L.A., said in his opening statement that the bankers were driven by “greed” and wanted to make “higher bonuses and higher salaries through making loans to a company” — i.e. Parmalat — “that they shouldn’t have been making.” Bondi sued Citi for $2.2 billion. The case was heard in Bergen County Superior Court in New Jersey.

But Citi’s lawyer — Paul Weiss’s Ted Wells — argued that Citi lost more money than any other creditor as a result of the fraud. Wells said the bank made only about $131 million in fees in about nine years of working with Parmalat. The bank had recovered about $330 million it lost due to the fraud, Wells said in his opening. Citi sought $699 million in counterclaims.

Today, Citi recovered more than half what it requested — $364 million. The jury, reports the WSJ, rejected Bondi’s allegations that Citi aided and abetted a breach of fiduciary duty by corrupt Parmalat insiders.

Separately, Bondi is pursuing claims against Bank of America and Grant Thornton in U.S. District Court in Manhattan. The case is expected to go to trial sometime next year. The companies also have denied any wrongdoing.

“We have said from the beginning of this case that we have done nothing wrong,” a Citi spokeswoman said. “Citi was the largest victim of the Parmalat fraud and not part of it.”
Parmalat didn’t immediately have a comment.

Last edited by top_admin; Oct 20th, 2008 at 05:10 PM.
WSJ Law Blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fired while Waitressing, spilled water valid? Unregistered Hiring, Firing, Wrongful Termination 5 Sep 12th, 2009 01:58 PM
Crying Calif mom arraigned on murder, rape charges (AP) Yahoo! News Crimes and Trials News 1 Apr 15th, 2009 02:28 AM
In Snyder v. Bronfman, Best Tabloid Suit of 2007, Bronfman Triumphs WSJ Law Blog Law News 0 Dec 23rd, 2008 10:21 PM
Parmalat class action Unregistered Class Actions & Defective Products 1 Jun 17th, 2008 05:55 PM
can wells fargo legally do this ihatewellsfargo Consumer Bankruptcy 1 Jan 4th, 2007 07:13 PM


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:13 AM.