WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Defending $3.6 Million Fee for Heller Case, Gura Returns D.C.’s Fire

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 14th, 2008, 08:50 AM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640

Default Defending $3.6 Million Fee for Heller Case, Gura Returns D.C.’s Fire



Robert Levy, center, and Alan Gura, right, June 26, 2008. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

The fee fight over the most high-profile Supreme Court case of the century carries on.

The team of lawyers that represented Dick Heller before the High Court continues to face opposition from the District of Columbia over its nearly $3.6 million fee request. Heller’s lawyers say they worked on the case on a pro bono basis and claim that they agreed at the outset of the litigation that they’re entitled to recover their cash outlays and the reasonable value of their time, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. (For Alan Gura, who led the team, the request would earn him about $1.9 million for an estimated 1,661 hours.)

As the Legal Times reports, negotiations over fees between Team Gura and D.C. broke down in September. The District filed an opposition brief, complaining that the $3.6 million request was “highly unreasonable.” The city proposed $798,232 in fees and $9,480 in litigation costs. Acting D.C. Attorney General Peter Nickles conceded that the opponents’ victory in the famed Second Amendment case was “significant” and that the attorneys’ performance was “above-average,” but he said a fee enhancement was unwarranted because the Heller team succeeded on proven legal theories — rather than novel ones — and also used the assistance of nearly 50 amicus briefs from various states and members of Congress. (Nickles didn’t mention the number of amicus briefs filed on behalf of D.C., but we do know that city used O’Melveny & Myers, Akin Gump, and Covington & Burling.)

Last week, Gura filed a reply, attacking D.C. for mounting a defense valued “into the millions” while attempting to diminish the work of the Heller team.

Loyal LB’ers: Fees have cropped up lately in several contexts — from Vioxx litigation, to September 11 litigation to FACTA litigation (where, in one case, the fees outmatched the recovery by a ratio of nearly 100:1). But here, Team Gura’s request doesn’t seem all that crazy. What gives?

Last edited by top_admin : Oct 14th, 2008 at 09:36 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge in Kuehne Case Finds Feds’ Charge ‘Disturbing’ WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Dec 1st, 2008 10:10 AM
The Lehman Bankruptcy Fee Watch: Advisers to Get $906 Million? WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 10th, 2008 11:20 AM
Judge Under Fire for YouTube Order; Cap’n Awesome’s Unhappy WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Aug 6th, 2008 08:21 PM
What’s the Right Way to Fire an Associate? WSJ_law_blog Hiring, Firing, Wrongful Termination 0 May 8th, 2008 07:01 PM
Miami Lawyer Ben Kuehne, Indicted by Feds, Returns Fire WSJ_law_blog Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 Mar 26th, 2008 01:00 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:13 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.