WORLD Law Direct Forums
Home > WORLD Law Direct Forums > FORUM INFORMATION > Law News > Sue on Your Own Dime: Litigation as a Form of Costless Entertainment

Sue on Your Own Dime: Litigation as a Form of Costless Entertainment

This is a discussion on Sue on Your Own Dime: Litigation as a Form of Costless Entertainment within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; An extraordinary number of people, institutions, and inanimate objects have wronged Tyrone Hurt. In just the last couple of years, ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 3rd, 2008, 06:50 PM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default Sue on Your Own Dime: Litigation as a Form of Costless Entertainment

An extraordinary number of people, institutions, and inanimate objects have wronged Tyrone Hurt. In just the last couple of years, Hurt has sued the Declaration of Independence, Black’s Law Dictionary, the United Nations, agencies of the District of Columbia and the Federal Government, and various courts and their officers. Hurt has . . . demanded the deportation of a Spanish-speaking government employee. — Per curiam opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (HT: How Appealing)



Since 2006, Tyrone Hurt has filed more than seventy appeals with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, but has managed to avoid filing fees in most of these cases. That’s because the district court routinely grants Hurt’s application to proceed in forma pauperis — or IFP.

For a roster of some of Hurt’s lawsuits, including his suit against the Declaration of Independence, click here.

Today, the Court of Appeals said enough is enough. Hurt must sue on his own dime. “Given Hurt’s history of filing frivolous claims and appeals,” the court writes, “he easily satisfies the standard for revocation of the IFP privilege. However, his penchant for litigation as a form of costless entertainment compels us to go one step further and ask whether we may bar him from proceeding IFP in all future civil appeals.”

The court holds that “the number, content, frequency, and disposition” Hurts filings is “aimed at taking advantage of the IFP privilege,” and concludes: “Hurt has brought numerous . . . while asking for sums of money dwarfing the size of the Federal Government’s annual budget. . . . If Hurt wishes to continue wasting this Court’s time by appealing dismissals of his absurd and frivolous claims, he should have to do it on his own dime.”

Last edited by top_admin; Oct 4th, 2008 at 11:17 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judicial Clerkships on BigLaw’s Dime: But is it Ethical? WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Jun 22nd, 2009 07:50 AM
Music/Entertainment Forum bcap Miscellaneous Topics 1 Jan 15th, 2009 11:50 AM
US-ENTERTAINMENT Summary (Reuters) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Sep 25th, 2008 10:00 PM
Report: Tropicana Entertainment to File for Bankruptcy WSJ_law_blog Business Bankruptcy 0 May 5th, 2008 05:20 PM


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.