Sue on Your Own Dime: Litigation as a Form of Costless Entertainment
This is a discussion on Sue on Your Own Dime: Litigation as a Form of Costless Entertainment within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; An extraordinary number of people, institutions, and inanimate objects have wronged Tyrone Hurt. In just the last couple of years, ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438
|
An extraordinary number of people, institutions, and inanimate objects have wronged Tyrone Hurt. In just the last couple of years, Hurt has sued the Declaration of Independence, Black’s Law Dictionary, the United Nations, agencies of the District of Columbia and the Federal Government, and various courts and their officers. Hurt has . . . demanded the deportation of a Spanish-speaking government employee. — Per curiam opinion of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (HT: How Appealing)
![]() Since 2006, Tyrone Hurt has filed more than seventy appeals with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, but has managed to avoid filing fees in most of these cases. That’s because the district court routinely grants Hurt’s application to proceed in forma pauperis — or IFP. For a roster of some of Hurt’s lawsuits, including his suit against the Declaration of Independence, click here. Today, the Court of Appeals said enough is enough. Hurt must sue on his own dime. “Given Hurt’s history of filing frivolous claims and appeals,” the court writes, “he easily satisfies the standard for revocation of the IFP privilege. However, his penchant for litigation as a form of costless entertainment compels us to go one step further and ask whether we may bar him from proceeding IFP in all future civil appeals.” The court holds that “the number, content, frequency, and disposition” Hurts filings is “aimed at taking advantage of the IFP privilege,” and concludes: “Hurt has brought numerous . . . while asking for sums of money dwarfing the size of the Federal Government’s annual budget. . . . If Hurt wishes to continue wasting this Court’s time by appealing dismissals of his absurd and frivolous claims, he should have to do it on his own dime.” Last edited by top_admin; Oct 4th, 2008 at 11:17 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
«
On Glorified Paralegal Work and False Promises of Dealmaking
|
Liability for Lehman? Our Capital Position at the Moment is Strong
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Judicial Clerkships on BigLaw’s Dime: But is it Ethical? | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Jun 22nd, 2009 07:50 AM |
| Music/Entertainment Forum | bcap | Miscellaneous Topics | 1 | Jan 15th, 2009 11:50 AM |
| US-ENTERTAINMENT Summary (Reuters) | Yahoo!_news | Crimes and Trials News | 0 | Sep 25th, 2008 10:00 PM |
| Report: Tropicana Entertainment to File for Bankruptcy | WSJ_law_blog | Business Bankruptcy | 0 | May 5th, 2008 05:20 PM |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:43 PM.









Linear Mode


