![]() |
|
|||||||
| Law News Breaking law news and events. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 573
|
![]() An unexpected twist at the Senator Stevens trial today: The defense, according to this WSJ report, has alleged that prosecutors withheld key evidence. U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan expressed concern about the allegations and blasted prosecutors for secretly sending Rocky Williams, a construction foreman who was involved in renovations on Stevens’s home and a witness for the prosecution, back to Alaska. Stevens is facing charges that he accepted more than $250,000 in gifts — including the home renovations — from Veco Corp., an oil-services company. “I’m peeved about that,” Judge Sullivan said. “What gives the government the authority to do that?” Defense lawyers say Williams contacted them over the weekend and provided them with significant evidence that undermines the government’s case. Defense lawyers said Williams told them he spent much less time working on Stevens’s home than Veco’s accounting records indicate. That evidence, they said, “gravely undercuts” the government’s argument that Veco spent $188,000 of its own money on Stevens’s house. Williams had been in Washington, D.C., preparing to testify, but prosecutors sent him to back to Alaska last Thursday, saying they no longer needed his testimony. Prosecutors didn’t alert the defense or Judge Sullivan that Williams was leaving town. Judge Sullivan said he was “flabbergasted” by the government’s actions. Prosecutor Nicholas Marsh told Judge Sullivan that the government didn’t withhold evidence from Stevens’s lawyers and that Williams’ testimony wouldn’t have changed the basic issues in the case. “We believed we disclosed exactly what we needed to,” Mr. Marsh said. In light of the developments, Stevens’s lawyers have asked Judge Sullivan to declare a mistrial or dismiss all charges. Judge Sullivan said he was “not inclined at this point” to take either action, but he indicated that he will recall witnesses who already testified and let Stevens’s lawyers question them again. Last edited by top_admin : Sep 30th, 2008 at 01:29 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Was the Massage Chair Sen. Stevenss Photofete Moment? | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Oct 28th, 2008 12:20 PM |
| Senator Ted Stevens Found Guilty | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 1 | Oct 27th, 2008 06:45 PM |
| Not A Potted Plant: A Look at Ted Stevenss Lawyer | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Oct 13th, 2008 08:40 PM |
| A Dating Game for Lawyers: Inside the Linens n Things Beauty Pageant | WSJ_law_blog | Business Bankruptcy | 0 | May 20th, 2008 09:50 AM |
| Fallout from LAffaire Spitzer: Kristen Sues Girls Gone Wild Founder | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Apr 29th, 2008 01:00 PM |