WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Scalia: University of Chicago Law Lost Its Conservative Cred

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 17th, 2008, 01:30 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640

Default Scalia: University of Chicago Law Lost Its Conservative Cred



What with the summer SCOTUS break we’ve been having a bit of Justice Scalia withdrawal around here. But recently he’s been back on tour, stopping yesterday at his teaching alma mater, University of Chicago Law School, where he served up a withering critique of what he sees as the school’s new liberal bent.

According to this piece in the Chicago Sun-Times, Scalia told 500 members of the Federalist Society that, back in the days when he used to teach at Chicago — from 1977 to 1982 — the courses had more rigor and the school had a more conservative ethos.

“I regret it,” Scalia said. “I don’t think the University of Chicago is what it was in my time. I would not recommend it to students looking for a law school as I would have years ago. It has changed considerably and intentionally. It has lost the niche it once had as a rigorous and conservative law school.”

Scalia also had advice for students. “I took nothing but bread-and-butter classes, not ‘Law and Poverty,’ or other made-up stuff,” said Scalia, a Harvard law grad. “Take serious classes,” he urged students. “There’s so much law to learn. Don’t waste your time.”

And of course a Scalia speech wouldn’t be a Scalia speech without a shot at his perceived “activist” colleagues on the Court. “What did I learn at Harvard Law School or at my practice in Ohio or in the federal government that qualifies me to determine whether there ought to be — and therefore is — a right to abortion or to homosexual sodomy or a right to suicide?” Scalia asked. “I don’t know any more about that than Joe Six-pack.”

Last edited by top_admin : Sep 17th, 2008 at 01:33 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Law Blog and Scalia, Part III: When Clients Win in Spite of Their Lawyers WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 May 30th, 2008 09:40 PM
Law Blog Chats with Scalia: On Knowing Your Audience, and Italian Fare WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 May 30th, 2008 01:30 PM
A law firm lost my personal and bank account details... Unregistered Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 Feb 8th, 2008 09:53 PM
chicago law on smoking Unregistered Other Healthcare Law Issues 1 Jul 24th, 2007 12:01 PM
university degree Unregistered Job Discrimination & Harassment 1 Jun 1st, 2007 10:31 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:27 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.