WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Court: Frozen Sperm Off Limits to California Woman

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 15th, 2008, 12:30 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640

Default Court: Frozen Sperm Off Limits to California Woman



On Friday, we addressed the problems associated with a judge ordering a woman, as a condition of probation, to abstain from having children. In another case that implicates reproductive law, Iris Kievernagel has been told by an appellate court in California that she can’t use her deceased husband’s frozen sperm to inseminate herself. Here’s the story from the San Fran Chron, and here’s the opinion.

Citing precedent for the proposition that the “the right of procreational autonomy is composed of two rights of equal significance–the right to procreate and the right to avoid procreation,” the court writes:
In this case we must decide whether a widow has the right to use her late husband’s frozen sperm to attempt to conceive a child where her late husband signed an agreement with the company storing the frozen sperm providing that the frozen sperm was to be discarded upon his death. We conclude that in determining the disposition of gamete material, to which no other party has contributed and thus another party’s right to procreational autonomy is not implicated, the intent of the donor must control.
According to the court, Joseph Kievernagel, a Sacramento County sheriff who died in a 2005 helicopter crash, wished not to father a child after death.

The new ruling “provides some much-needed guidance in an area where reproductive technology has clearly outstripped the legal system,” said Jay-Allen Eisen, lawyer for the husband’s parents, who opposed the widow’s request.

Suzanne Alves, a lawyer for Iris Kievernagel, said the court failed to address “the near-impossibility of determining someone’s intent when they pass away” and leave no will. She said her client would consider an appeal to the state Supreme Court.

Interestingly, the court said the situation would be different, the court said, if the dispute involved frozen embryos - fertilized eggs - which would require that both spouses’ wishes be considered.

Photo: iStockPhoto

Last edited by top_admin : Sep 15th, 2008 at 12:35 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 23rd, 2008, 08:24 PM     #2
debora kievernagel
 
debora kievernagel's Avatar
 
Posts: n/a

Default Re: Court: Frozen Sperm Off Limits to California Woman

Joe and Iris both signed the document. Iris knew my brothers wishes before his death. Iris is currently remmarried and is expecting a new baby with her new husband. So why does she still want my brothers dead sperm. It isnt for sentimental reasons, try money.
My brothers good name is being dragged through courts and newspapers because of a very selfish woman.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time Limits On Molestation In California? BYoung Miscellaneous Topics 2 Mar 29th, 2008 03:39 PM
sperm donor contracts - UT / WY petcrows Child Custody & Support 4 Jul 1st, 2007 07:24 PM
Supreme Court Limits Discrimination Suits Unregistered Hiring, Firing, Wrongful Termination 2 May 29th, 2007 03:52 PM
Sperm from a dead soldier gives life, court rules Unregistered Other Family Law Matters 0 Jan 30th, 2007 12:50 AM
sperm donor and child support Unregistered Divorce, Separation, Annulment 0 Sep 30th, 2006 08:16 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:20 AM.


Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.