WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Judge: Standard Set By Duke Football Team Couldn’t Be Any Lower

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 9th, 2008, 01:30 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 573

Default Judge: Standard Set By Duke Football Team Couldn’t Be Any Lower



Lawyers for Duke University were recently forced into making an odd argument: As a matter of law, the Duke football team couldn’t be any worse.

Here’s the story from the Georgia Bankruptcy Blog, and here’s what happened: The University of Louisville (Go Cards!) filed suit against Duke in Kentucky state court because Duke backed out of a contract to play a four-game series against Louisville. Duke defended the decision based on a provision in the contract which stated that it had to pay a fee of $150,000 per game only if Louisville was unable to find a replacement opponent of “similar stature” to Duke.

What does similar stature mean? In discovery, Duke clarified that “any and all college varsity teams in the Football Bowl Subdivision (formerly Division I-A) are teams of a ’similar stature’ to Duke,” though it conceded that “junior varsity programs of any of the aforementioned teams would not be teams of a ’similar stature’ to Duke’s varsity college football team.”

At oral argument, a Duke lawyer said:
I think the Court can absolutely positively take judicial notice that Duke is probably the worst football team in Division I football. Everybody knows that. That’s no secret. The longest losing streak, the inability to ever win games. . .We certainly don’t have to go out and take six months of discovery to establish that for you. . .So the bottom line is how much discovery, if any, should anyone have to take, want to take or need to take to make the simple analysis of whether or not that was a team of similar stature? It’s judicial notice that they got beat by Utah. Maybe that’s part of the dispute -- that they wish they’d played somebody weaker, like Duke which would have been an automatic W.
On summary judgment, the court agreed:
The term ‘team of similar stature’ simply means any team that competes at the same level of athletic performance as the Duke football team. At oral argument, Duke . . . persuasively asserted that this is a threshold that could not be any lower. . .Duke won only one football game, and lost eleven, during the 2007 football season.

Last edited by top_admin : Sep 9th, 2008 at 04:47 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bad News for RIAA? Judge to Reconsider Infringement Standard WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Aug 15th, 2008 08:40 AM
Team leader Sanjay Other Real Estate Law Matters 1 Jul 28th, 2008 02:44 PM
A Q&A With the Lawyer Behind the All-Star High School Football Game WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 25th, 2008 06:40 PM
Duke to Lax Players: You’re Hurting our Reputation! WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 10th, 2008 10:01 AM
Flag Football Injury Unregistered Injury & Worker's Compensation 1 Jan 23rd, 2007 09:20 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.