Brocade Takes on Plaintiffs Firms; If You Can’t Settle With ‘Em, Hire ‘Em
This is a discussion on Brocade Takes on Plaintiffs Firms; If You Can’t Settle With ‘Em, Hire ‘Em within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; The backdating scandal at Brocade has heralded a few legal twists. In May, a shareholder derivative suit named Brocade’s law ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438
|
![]() The backdating scandal at Brocade has heralded a few legal twists. In May, a shareholder derivative suit named Brocade’s law firm, Wilson Sonsini, accusing the firm of malpractice for blessing backdating at the company. Then, Wilson Sonsini agreed to pay Brocade $9.5 million to release itself and its chairman, Larry Sonsini, from possible civil claims filed by a Brocade special litigation committee stemming from the company’s backdating mess. Now two San Diego-based plaintiffs firms — Johnson Bottini and Robbins Umeda & Fink — have agreed to drop their backdating suits and flip over to Brocade’s special litigation committee, a gig that guarantees them $8 million, plus a piece of anything that’s recovered from the 10 former Brocade execs who’ve been sued by the company. Here’s the story from the Recorder. Dewey & LeBeouf, the lawyers on the special litigation committee, filed this engagement letter after Northern District of California Judge Charles Breyer said at a Thursday hearing that he wanted the agreement between Dewey and the plaintiffs lawyers out in the open. The engagement letter caps the company’s total obligation to Johnson Bottini and Robbins Umeda at $25 million, though it allows it to choose to pay them more. The special litigation committee filed the suit for Brocade on Aug. 1 and sought to dismiss the pending state and federal derivative suits filed by Johnson Bottini and Robbins Umeda. Neither Marc Umeda nor Frank Bottini returned the Recorder’s calls seeking comment. Last edited by top_admin; Aug 25th, 2008 at 11:57 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
«
Chicken-of-the-Sea Headed Back to Court Over Mercury Poisoning
|
Marines Cited With Contempt for Refusing to Testify Against Sergeant
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Calpers Sues Ratings Firms; SEC Chief Also Takes Aim | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Jul 16th, 2009 08:10 AM |
| Can’t Keep Her Outta the Courtroom! Sandra Day Authors 1st Cir. Opinion | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Jul 10th, 2008 12:30 PM |
| Brocade Pays $160 Million to Settle Options-Backdating Suit | WSJ_law_blog | Class Actions & Defective Products | 0 | Jun 2nd, 2008 07:00 PM |
| Kickbacks to Plaintiffs: Industry Problem? | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | May 2nd, 2008 10:50 AM |
| Can I contact plaintiffs if I have no attorney? | KathiKY1 | Miscellaneous Topics | 1 | May 14th, 2007 04:36 PM |
Our lawyers can help you avoid foreclosure to salvage your home,
buy time to pay mortgage debts, and resolve your financial troubles. Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.









Linear Mode

