![]() |
|
|||||||
| Law News Breaking law news and events. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640
|
TORT LAW - PRENATAL INJURIES - SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS REFUSES TO RECOGNIZE CAUSE OF ACTION BROUGHT BY FETUS AGAINST ITS MOTHER FOR UNINTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF PRENATAL INJURIES. — Title of Barack Obama’s unsigned student note for the Harvard Law Review (1990), published a month before he became president of The Review
![]() Barack Obama while a student at Harvard Law School, holding a copy the Harvard Law Review. (AP/Obama Presidential Campaign) Finally, evidence that Barack Obama did, in fact, take a stab at legal scholarship. Politico has turned up an unsigned — and previously unattributed — 1990 article. The six-page summary reportedly considers the question of whether fetuses should be able to file lawsuits against their mothers. Obama concluded that the answer was no, and cited approvingly an Illinois Supreme Court ruling, Stallman v. Youngquist, that the unborn cannot sue their mothers for negligence, suggesting that allowing fetuses to sue would violate the mother’s rights and could cause her to take more risks with her pregnancy. He reportedly ends the article with the following: “Expanded access to prenatal education and heath care facilities will far more likely serve the very real state interest in preventing increasing numbers of children from being born in to lives of pain and despair.” Obama spokesman Ben LaBolt wrote to Politico in an e-mail: Like most second-year law students on the Harvard Law Review, Senator Obama wrote an unsigned student case comment that summarized a recent decision by a state or lower federal court. The piece analyzed a case in which a mother was sued by her child for injuries caused by the mother’s negligent driving during her pregnancy. Senator Obama concluded that, in such cases, the Illinois Supreme Court was correct not to allow lawsuits by children against their mothers. He wrote that the best way to protect the health of fetuses was to provide prenatal education and health care to pregnant women - issues he remains committed to today and which he has worked to advance as a legislator and in this campaign.LB Footnote: A footnote to Obama’s article reportedly explains the facts of Stallman, the Illinois case: Bari Stallman was involved in a car accident in 1981 with Clarence Youngquist. Her daughter, Lindsey, was born with severe injuries from the wreck, and so Stallman’s husband, acting for the baby, sued both his wife and Youngquist for negligence, hoping to recover damages from their insurance companies. The Illinois Supreme Court held that the fetus doesn’t have the right to sue its mother, warning that allowing a fetus to sue its mother could make them “legal adversaries from the moment of conception until birth.” Last edited by top_admin : Aug 22nd, 2008 at 11:03 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Innocent fetus in custodial battle! | Unregistered | Child Custody & Support | 2 | Oct 24th, 2008 08:06 AM |
| ending lease early | Unregistered | Landlord vs Tenant Issues | 4 | Oct 1st, 2008 08:35 AM |
| Married too early | Cheesecake | Other Immigration Law & Visas | 0 | Sep 10th, 2008 01:40 PM |
| how does the law view recklessness | Unregistered | Attorneys & Legal Ethics | 1 | Feb 10th, 2008 06:26 PM |
| Early termination | Unregistered | Hiring, Firing, Wrongful Termination | 1 | Mar 10th, 2007 01:23 PM |