WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

No Whistlin’ Dixie: Court Upholds School Ban on Confederate Flags

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 20th, 2008, 06:11 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640

Default No Whistlin’ Dixie: Court Upholds School Ban on Confederate Flags



In 2005, Steven Lafon, the principal of the William Blount High School in Maryville, Tennessee, told an assembly of the freshman class that students “would not be allowed to have Rebel flags or symbols of [the] Rebel flag” on their clothes. That policy displeased students Derek Barr, Chris White and Roger Craig White. They wanted to express their southern heritage by wearing clothing depicting the Confederate flag. So they sued.

Today, in the face of the plaintiffs’ free speech claims, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a grant of summary judgment in favor of the school. Here’s the opinion.

Explaining the rationale for the ban, the court cites the testimony of a Tennessee school director who said that racial tensions at the school comprised the context for the clothing ban. “Relevant incidents,” writes the court, “included racist graffiti that made general threats against the lives of African-Americans, graffiti containing ‘hit lists’ of specific students? names, physical altercations between African-American and white students, and a police lockdown at the school.” Of the approximately 1,750 students attending William Blount, less than ten percent are African-American.

In its opinion, the Sixth Circuit distinguished this case from Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. Comm School, the landmark First Amendment case that struck down a school ban on armbands to protest the Vietnam War.

In Tinker there were no facts in the record that would ‘reasonably have led school authorities to forecast substantial disruption of or material interference with school activities, and no disturbances or disorders on the school premises in fact occurred’ as a result of students wearing black armbands in protest of the Vietnam War. The facts in this case, however, even when viewed in a light most favorable to Plaintiffs-Appellants, indicate that school officials could reasonably forecast that permitting students to wear clothing depicting the Confederate flag would cause disruptions to the school environment.

Last edited by top_admin : Aug 21st, 2008 at 07:27 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NY Law School Races to Court, Sues Merkin Over Madoff Investments WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Dec 17th, 2008 12:20 PM
NFL Vikings players win first court battle on doping ban (AFP) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Dec 4th, 2008 03:30 AM
ECHR Upholds Turkey’s 10% Threshold in Elections ILJ_Digest International Law News 0 Oct 7th, 2008 12:50 AM
California's top court overturns gay marriage ban top_admin Law News 0 May 15th, 2008 02:12 PM
High Court Upholds Kentucky WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 16th, 2008 12:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.