![]() |
|
|||||||
| Law News Breaking law news and events. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640
|
![]() Just when you thought you’d never have to hear the word “Hazelwood” again, the Exxon-Valdez case is back in the news. The Supreme Court today issued yet another ruling on the case — the second in as many months. In June, the justices slashed the plaintiffs’ punitive damages award from $5 billion to $507.5 million, ruling that, at least in the maritime law field, a punitive award should be at most on the same level as the compensatory award. At issue in today’s ruling: whether plaintiffs should be awarded interest in the $507.5 million. We’re not talking chump change: plaintiffs are looking for an extra $490 million or so, which would push its total recovery on punitives to around $1 billion. The Court ruled, however, that the Ninth Circuit should decide the issue “on the award remaining, a matter on which this Court declines to rule in the first instance, without prejudice to the position of any party.” Call us crazy, but we’d bet we see this back at the Supreme Court in a year or two, after whichever party loses at the 9th Circuit appeals. The wheels of justice grind, though sometimes slowly. Click here for the story from Scotusblog. For more background on the interest dispute, check out Nate Raymond’s nice story in this month’s American Lawyer (link not available). Exxon’s “history is to jack people around until the last day,” said Faegre & Benson’s Brian O’Neill, a lawyer for the plaintiffs. Responded John Daum of O’Melveny & Myers, Exxon’s counsel: “We’ve litigated for 15 years and the Supreme Court has decided Exxon should pay $507.5 million.” According to the piece, the Exxon Valdez matter could ultimately prove costly to the plaintiffs’ lawyers. As of 2003, a filing reportedly stated they’d invested some $185 million in attorney time. With interest, they now stand to bring home between $180 and $190 million. Photo: AP Last edited by top_admin : Aug 12th, 2008 at 06:53 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wholesale Recusal Request Puts 9th Circuit in Unchartered Waters | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Nov 7th, 2008 05:40 PM |
| Ninth Circuit Copyright Case Debunk the Myth of U.S. Copyright Protection | Unregistered | Internet Law | 3 | Oct 11th, 2008 03:24 PM |
| A petition to the Ninth Circuit on Copyright case | Unregistered | Copyright, Trademark, Patent | 1 | Aug 29th, 2008 12:03 AM |
| Second Circuit Stings SDNY in “Specialist” Case | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | Jul 18th, 2008 02:21 PM |
| 11th Circuit Deals Blow to Marathon Tax-Evasion Case | WSJ_law_blog | Attorneys & Legal Ethics | 0 | Apr 7th, 2008 09:21 PM |