WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Microsoft goes to court over mouse patents

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 31st, 2008, 06:16 AM     #1
Veteran Member
 
Metropolitanjury's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 31st, 2008 06:18 AM
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 98

Default Microsoft goes to court over mouse patents

Microsoft alleges that a rival maker of computer mice has wrongly made use of its patented hardware technologies and refused to license them.

In a complaint filed Wednesday with the U.S. International Trade Commission (PDF, 33 pages), Microsoft alleges that Primax Electronics Ltd. of Taiwan is selling computer mice that violate seven of its patents. The complaint seeks to prevent Primax from selling the products in the U.S.

Microsoft also is expected to file suit in U.S. District Court, seeking damages.

The patents in dispute relate to Microsoft's tilt wheel technique, which lets users tilt the scroll wheel on a mouse or keyboard to maneuver the cursor on screen; and its "U2" technology, an automated technique for connecting a mouse to a computer using either USB or PS/2 ports, two types of interfaces for peripherals.

Efforts to reach a Primax representative were unsuccessful Wednesday evening.

More than 20 other companies have licensed the technologies in question, said Horacio Gutierrez, a Microsoft vice president and deputy general counsel for intellectual property and licensing. Microsoft previously took peripheral maker Belkin to court over the U2 technology, resulting in a settlement, but it's uncommon for the company to pursue such actions, Gutierrez said. Microsoft prefers to reach licensing deals. The company is more commonly a target of patent-infringement claims.

Gutierrez said Primax hasn't offered any justification for not entering a patent agreement. "We've over two years repeatedly approached them, to engage in good-faith negotiations, and they've just refused to have any meaningful conversations," he said. "There isn't a question of the validity of the patents.

There isn't an argument of non-infringement. They've just refused to have the conversation."

By Ms.Bobby Aanand, Metropolitan Jury
Metropolitanjury is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VocalTec Receives $9.2 Million Netfrom the Sale of 11 of its 22 Patents Metropolitanjury Law News 0 Jul 22nd, 2008 05:53 AM
Microsoft Must Pay $512M Over Alcatel-Lucent Patents Metropolitanjury International Law News 0 Jun 25th, 2008 06:45 AM
Manufacturing Cos lead in filing patents in India Metropolitanjury International Law News 0 Jun 13th, 2008 05:56 AM
The Microsoft Lottery Scam? Unregistered Internet Law 1 Sep 15th, 2007 08:39 PM
part of a mouse found in canned vegetables Califor, Unregistered Class Actions & Defective Products 1 Mar 15th, 2007 04:31 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Top crime attorneys

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.