WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

50 Cent Looking for Big Change Outta Taco Bell

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 23rd, 2008, 09:20 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 563

Default 50 Cent Looking for Big Change Outta Taco Bell



This afternoon, as we pored over a complaint, filed in New York federal court by rapper 50 Cent, our new editor, Jennifer Forsyth, asked a fair question: What does “50 Cent” mean? Not surprisingly, this exposed a gap in our admittedly shoddy knowledge of things hip-hop. We’ve seen “Get Rich or Die Tryin’,” the 2005 biopic of Curtis Jackson (a/k/a 50 Cent), but this item of trivia still eluded us.

With some research we discovered — and we apologize to those LB readers for whom this is common knowledge — that the young Jackson took his name from Kelvin Martin, a 1980s Brooklyn robber known as “50 Cent”. Jackson chose the name, he’s said in interviews, because it’s a metaphor for change and he is the same kind of person the first 50 cent was — someone who provided for himself by any means.

Now, 50 Cent is trying to provide a little more for himself — through legal means. He’s suing Taco Bell, a division of Yum! Brands Inc., for, among other things, trademark infringement, alleging that the restaurant drafted a fake letter (attached at the end of the complaint) purporting to ask Jackson to change his name to “79 Cent,” “89 Cent” or “99 Cent” in order to publicize its “79-89-99 Cent Why Pay More Value Menu.”

Taco Bell released the letter to the national press in June before sending it to Jackson, the complaint alleges. “Simply put, Taco Bell knew that it would likely have had to pay Jackson a multi-million-dollar fee to get his endorsement, even if he had agreed to do it — which is in doubt,” says the suit, which was filed by Reed Smith’s Peter D. Raymond and Wallace B. Neel. “Rather than face rejection or pay fair value, Taco Bell chose to steal his endorsement and to enjoy all the publicity of being associated with a mega-star while bearing none of the costs.”

A message placed by Dow Jones Newswires reporter Chad Bray to Yum! Brands was not returned.

Here’s the top of the letter/advertisement:
Dear Mr. Jackson:We know that you adopted the name 50 Cent years ago as a metaphor for change. We at Taco Bell are also huge advocates of change. In fact, for just a few spare coins, we’re giving consumers more variety for less money with our new 79-89-99 Why Pay More value menu . . . So here’s our offer of change to you: For one day this summer, change your name either 79 Cent, 89 Cent or 99 Cent by showing up to one of our more than 5,600 locations nationwide and rapping your order in the drive thru with your new moniker.

Last edited by top_admin : Jul 24th, 2008 at 07:47 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
BIG SURPRISE nevaeh11 Miscellaneous Topics 1 Nov 21st, 2008 10:09 PM
Can’t Keep Her Outta the Courtroom! Sandra Day Authors 1st Cir. Opinion WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Jul 10th, 2008 12:30 PM
Hong Kong GDP hits 7.1 per cent year on year FT_news China News 0 May 16th, 2008 07:40 AM
BELL CANADA Unregistered Car Accident Claims 1 Jan 6th, 2007 04:08 PM
A Big Mess Unregistered Car Accident Claims 1 Dec 13th, 2006 04:16 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.