WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Consumer Groups File Appeal on Challenge of Human Stem Cell Patent Held By WARF

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 19th, 2008, 06:32 AM     #1
Veteran Member
 
Metropolitanjury's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 31st, 2008 06:18 AM
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 98

Default Consumer Groups File Appeal on Challenge of Human Stem Cell Patent Held By WARF

Two consumer groups today filed an appeal in their challenge of a controversial patent on human embryonic stem cells held by the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF).

Consumer Watchdog, formerly The Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights, and the Public Patent Foundation appealed to the U.S. Patent Office's Board of Appeals and Interferences. The PTO examiner narrowed WARF's patent after the two groups requested a re-examination of the patent in July 2006. Initially all the patent claims were rejected, but this spring the PTO granted the narrowed claims.

The two groups noted that the patent challenge has already improved the situation for stem cell researchers; shortly after the PTO launched the re-examination, WARF announced a substantial easing of its licensing requirements.

"WARF executives were acting like arrogant bullies blinded by dollar signs," said John M. Simpson, Consumer Watchdog's Stem Cell Project Director. "Our challenge has engendered a more co-operative stance towards the stem cell research community on their part."

"When we filed this challenge, we fully expected to take an appeal if necessary," said Dan Ravicher, PUBPAT's Executive Director and the attorney representing Consumer Watchdog before the PTO in these challenges. "Although we won a substantial victory at the examiner level when WARF was forced to narrow their patent claims, we still believe that even the narrower patent is invalid and that's the issue we plan to contest with the PTO's Board of Appeals."

Joining the two consumer groups in the challenge from the beginning was Dr. Jeanne Loring, now director of the Center for Regenerative Medicine at the Scripps Institute. Later in the case Dr. Alan Trounson, then of Australia's Monash University and now president of the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Dr. Douglas Melton of Harvard and Dr. Chad Cowan of Harvard filed affidavits supporting the challenge.

"It's not just scientists that are affected by the patents," said Dr. Loring. "Patients and their families know that WARF's iron-fisted control of stem cells is slowing life-saving research."

The appeal will show that the creation of human embryonic stem cell lines was obvious in the light of work that had been done in other species. No other country in the world recognizes the WARF stem cell patent.

By Ms.Bobby Aanand, Metropolitan Jury.
Metropolitanjury is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lawyers file 11th hour appeal for US death row inmate (AFP) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Oct 23rd, 2008 09:40 PM
Barr confirms patent challenge Metropolitanjury Law News 0 Jul 30th, 2008 06:22 AM
High Court Says ‘Fuggedaboutit’ To Brooklyners’ Appeal, Kelo Challenge WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Jun 23rd, 2008 06:20 PM
Abraxis to Appeal Jury Ruling on Elan Patent Infringement Claim Metropolitanjury Law News 0 Jun 14th, 2008 06:35 AM
Can you file for an appeal? Unregistered Trials & Sentencing 1 Oct 22nd, 2006 08:47 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:55 PM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.