WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Judge Jed Rakoff: ‘This Court Will Not Be Party to This Sham’

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 17th, 2008, 04:10 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640

Default Judge Jed Rakoff: ‘This Court Will Not Be Party to This Sham’



It’s not an everyday occurrence that a federal judge rejects a proposed co-lead plaintiff in a securities fraud class action because the plaintiff knew too little about the case. But New York federal judge Jed Rakoff made such a move yesterday, rejecting the Steamship Trade Association Longshoremen’s Pension Fund from serving as the co-lead plaintiff for the Monster Worldwide securities fraud class action. Here’s Rakoff’s opinion, as well as the story from the New York Law Journal.

Judge Rakoff used some strong wording in his opinion, saying he would “not be party to a sham.”

Wrote Rakoff:
To be sure, the requirement is modest: class representative status may be denied only “where the class representatives have so little knowledge of and involvement in the class action that they would be unable or unwilling to protect the interests of the class against the possibly competing interests of the attorneys.”

Here, as part of class certification discovery, defendants deposed STA-ILA witness Horace Alston, Co-Chairman of the fund, who testified that he was the person at STA-ILA most knowledgeable about the lawsuit. . . . However, Mr. Alston then testified that he did not know the name of the stock at issue in this case, did not know the name of either individual defendant, did not know whether STA-ILA ever owned Monster stock, did not know if an amended complaint had been filed, did not know whether he had ever seen any complaint in the action, did not know that defendant McKelvey had moved to dismiss the complaint, and did not know that STA-ILA had moved for pre-discovery summary judgment
Judge Rakoff slammed the plaintiffs lawyers with Labaton Sucharow, saying they left him with the “distinct impression” they “may not have fulfilled their professional responsibilities in proposing STA-ILA as a class representative.”

Christopher Keller of Labaton Sucharow told the NYLJ, “We have great respect for Judge Rakoff, but we feel his conclusion was a little harsh.” Continued Keller: “The rule requires that the person who is most knowledgeable be produced for deposition, and in this case the client failed to produce someone who was the most knowledgeable. Nothing about this was a sham.”

In any event, the lining was silver for Keller and the Labaton Sucharow gang. Rakoff went ahead and certified the class and selected as lead plaintiff the Middlesex County Retirement System, which he found had a better grasp of the facts.

The plaintiffs claim securities-law violations by Monster, former CEO and Chairman Andrew J. McKelvey and former general counsel and Senior Vice-President Myron Olesnyckyj. They allege shareholders were cheated because the online job search company improperly accounted for backdated stock options.

Last edited by top_admin : Jul 24th, 2008 at 07:56 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
judge didnt call me at the court Unregistered Child Custody & Support 0 Oct 1st, 2008 06:34 PM
Judge Judy and Judge Cristina wanting my sister on the show bjmbb Other Family Law Matters 9 Sep 26th, 2008 12:55 AM
ISSUE ON COURT ORDER BY JUDGE Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 1 Jun 17th, 2008 05:05 PM
third party laica Divorce, Separation, Annulment 0 Apr 4th, 2008 08:37 AM
Liability for injury to party guests during and after the party Unregistered Civil Litigation 1 Oct 31st, 2006 01:47 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:46 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.