WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Doug Kmiec Nominates Sidley’s Carter Phillips for High Court

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07-08-2008, 08:30 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
07-16-2008 12:37 PM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 372
Default Doug Kmiec Nominates Sidley’s Carter Phillips for High Court



Carter Phillips, representing Duke Energy, talks to reporters outside the Supreme Court, Nov. 1, 2006, following oral arguments in a case involving clean air regulation. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook)


Doug Kmiec, the perpetually polarizing Pepperdine prof, has an idea for a Supreme Court nominee: Carter G. Phillips.

Writing for Slate’s Convictions blog, Kmiec asks and answers the following question: “So if gender were not a consideration, is there a standout judicial candidate who could reorient the confirmation process away from real or imagined concerns with ‘activism’?and be acknowledged as superior in quality, temperament, and personal ethic of concern?”

Kmiec says there’s “not another advocate in the country” who is as respected as much as Phillips is for his “impartial legal judgment, personal integrity, and genuine friendship and assistance to his fellow members of the bar and to his community.”

Phillips (Ohio State U., Northwestern Law) is the managing partner of Sidley’s Washington, D.C., office. As Kmiec points out, Phillips, 56, argued five cases this term, bringing his total to 50 in private practice with an additional nine during his service in the Solicitor General’s office. According to Kmiec, Phillips, “with the circumspect demeanor of his mentor, the late Rex Lee, Phillips is one of those rare individuals of stature who could rather remarkably be seen as a nominee of either party.”

So what does Phillips think of all this? “It would be a substantial pay cut, for one thing,” he told the Law Blog.

“Unfortunately, the Constitution vested the power to nominate in the president. If it was otherwise, I’d be on the fast-track,” Phillips joked. “It’s very nice of Doug to write, but I don’t have any aspirations in that direction. I like practicing law. I’m fortunate to have much of my practice before the Supreme Court, and I think I’d like to stay just a Supreme Court lawyer.”

Last edited by top_admin : 07-08-2008 at 11:17 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mexico’s High Court Says Yes to Abortion WSJ_law_blog International Law News 0 08-28-2008 03:20 PM
High Court Says ‘Fuggedaboutit’ To Brooklyners’ Appeal, Kelo Challenge WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 06-23-2008 07:20 PM
High Court Shoots Down Challenge to Indiana WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 04-28-2008 01:21 PM
High Court Upholds Kentucky WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 04-16-2008 01:11 PM
High Court Order - Property Unregistered Debt Collection 1 10-20-2007 10:39 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:41 PM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct. Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.