![]() |
|
|||||||
| Law News Breaking law news and events. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Last Online:
07-16-2008 12:37 PM Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 372
|
![]() Carter Phillips, representing Duke Energy, talks to reporters outside the Supreme Court, Nov. 1, 2006, following oral arguments in a case involving clean air regulation. (AP Photo/Dennis Cook) Doug Kmiec, the perpetually polarizing Pepperdine prof, has an idea for a Supreme Court nominee: Carter G. Phillips. Writing for Slate’s Convictions blog, Kmiec asks and answers the following question: “So if gender were not a consideration, is there a standout judicial candidate who could reorient the confirmation process away from real or imagined concerns with ‘activism’?and be acknowledged as superior in quality, temperament, and personal ethic of concern?” Kmiec says there’s “not another advocate in the country” who is as respected as much as Phillips is for his “impartial legal judgment, personal integrity, and genuine friendship and assistance to his fellow members of the bar and to his community.” Phillips (Ohio State U., Northwestern Law) is the managing partner of Sidley’s Washington, D.C., office. As Kmiec points out, Phillips, 56, argued five cases this term, bringing his total to 50 in private practice with an additional nine during his service in the Solicitor General’s office. According to Kmiec, Phillips, “with the circumspect demeanor of his mentor, the late Rex Lee, Phillips is one of those rare individuals of stature who could rather remarkably be seen as a nominee of either party.” So what does Phillips think of all this? “It would be a substantial pay cut, for one thing,” he told the Law Blog. “Unfortunately, the Constitution vested the power to nominate in the president. If it was otherwise, I’d be on the fast-track,” Phillips joked. “It’s very nice of Doug to write, but I don’t have any aspirations in that direction. I like practicing law. I’m fortunate to have much of my practice before the Supreme Court, and I think I’d like to stay just a Supreme Court lawyer.” Last edited by top_admin : 07-08-2008 at 11:17 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mexico’s High Court Says Yes to Abortion | WSJ_law_blog | International Law News | 0 | 08-28-2008 03:20 PM |
| High Court Says ‘Fuggedaboutit’ To Brooklyners’ Appeal, Kelo Challenge | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | 06-23-2008 07:20 PM |
| High Court Shoots Down Challenge to Indiana | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | 04-28-2008 01:21 PM |
| High Court Upholds Kentucky | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | 04-16-2008 01:11 PM |
| High Court Order - Property | Unregistered | Debt Collection | 1 | 10-20-2007 10:39 AM |