WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

The ‘Perp Walk’ Debate: Prejudicial or Legit?

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 19th, 2008, 04:01 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640

Default The ‘Perp Walk’ Debate: Prejudicial or Legit?



Indicted former Bear Stearns fund manager Matthew Tannin being escorted to the courthouse. (Credit: Associated Press)


We’ve visited the topic of the perp walk before, but we thought that given the former Bear Stearns hedge fund managers being forced to do the walk earlier today, it was high time to revisit the issue. Why, we asked ourselves after watching the clips, does this ritual take place, especially when a suspect might otherwise willingly turn himself in? (Click here for visual history of the perp walk, from Tannin to Regis (Adelphia) to Skilling (Enron).)

For a little insight, we checked in with William “Mitch” Mitchelson, a former AUSA and current white-collar defense lawyer at Alston & Bird in Atlanta. Mitchelson, back in March of 2006, helped write this comprehensive piece in the National Law Journal on the perp walk.

Mitchelson informed us that whether a suspect does a perp walk is largely up to the prosecutor. The prosecutor can order an arrest warrant — in which case law-enforcement officials cuff the suspect (usually allowing the suspect to drape a coat over the cuffs, which, in our minds, always looks a little more conspicuous than the cuffs alone) and walk the suspect to his first court appearance. Or the prosecutor can simply issue a summons, allowing the suspect to turn himself in at a pre-appointed time.

Given the no-fuss, no-bother, no-cameras nature of the summons process, why do a perp walk at all? “In high profile cases, it lets the public know that law enforcement is taking action against a problem,” says Mitchelson. “It also encourages people with evidence to come forward.”

That said, Mitchelson, who worked as an AUSA in the Middle District of Florida in Jacksonville in the early 1990s, says he’s “not a big fan” of the perp walk. “Portraying someone in handcuffs right after an arrest really undermines the presumption of innocence, in my opinion.”

LBers, we’d love to hear from you on this one. On the whole, is making someone like Matthew Tannin walk the walk of shame a good thing?

Last edited by wld_team : Jun 19th, 2008 at 04:45 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
China toughens stance in emissions debate FT_news China News 1 Oct 28th, 2008 06:29 PM
Why Place Blame? The Debate Over No-Fault Divorce WSJ_law_blog Divorce, Separation, Annulment 2 May 29th, 2008 03:00 PM
News Debate on Drinking Age forum_admin Miscellaneous Topics 2 May 23rd, 2008 10:38 AM
Would these charges be legit? Unregistered Other Criminal Law Matters 1 Mar 3rd, 2008 10:25 AM
Debate about Spanish property market Jaralaraone Buying & Selling Property 0 Jul 13th, 2007 02:36 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.