WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Options Grant to Dead Exec Leads to $34.4 Million Settlement

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 5th, 2008, 12:40 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 564

Default Options Grant to Dead Exec Leads to $34.4 Million Settlement

There’s been a settlement in one of the more bizarro episodes of the stock-options backdating epidemic. In the fall of ‘06, the WSJ reported that Cablevision had awarded options to a deceased vice chairman, while making it appear as though the options had been granted prior to his 1999 death.



According to a company filing, Marc Lustgarten, Cablevision’s former chief negotiator and a close confidant of Charles Dolan, the company’s founder, received at least 400,000 options after his death (though it was unclear which of the options grants to Lustgarten was backdated). Also revealed in an SEC filing was an improperly-awarded grant to a compensation consultant, which had been awarded as if he were an employee.

In the WSJ’s 2006 story, Brian Foley, a compensation consultant, summed up the situation at Cablevision nicely. While the dollar amounts of Cablevision’s restatement were relatively small compared with restatements at other companies with stock-options timing issues, he said, he was surprised by the depth and range of the problems unearthed by the investigation. “Once you take the lid off and look inside, you realize that the short rubber boots aren’t going to do and you need the hip-waders,” said Foley. “How could you have this many things go awry?”

Today, according to an AP report (via Forbes), Cablevision has said in a regulatory filing that it settled lawsuits stemming from those grants. Under terms of the settlement agreement, certain present and former Cablevision directors and execs will pay Cablevision $24.4 million, while Cablevision’s liability insurer will kick in another $10 million. Cablevision has also agreed to adopt a number of corporate governance changes relating to stock-based compensation awards.

The case — brought as a class action and a derivative action on behalf of Cablevision shareholders — was helmed by Stuart Grant and Megan McIntyre, of Grant & Eisenhofer. They were joined by lawyers from Shiffrin Barroway and Shapiro Haber & Urmy.

On Cablevision’s side was S&C’s Gandolfo “Vince” DiBlasi, while Alston & Bird’s Nelson Boxer represented Cablevision’s special litigation committee.

Last edited by top_admin : Jun 5th, 2008 at 05:41 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
3Com to receieve $70 million payment from Realtek as part of patent settlement Metropolitanjury Law News 0 Jul 16th, 2008 06:39 AM
SAP to pay $83.3 million in Patent Settlement Metropolitanjury Law News 0 Jun 28th, 2008 06:37 AM
The Saga’s End (Almost): Milberg, Feds Reach $75 Million Settlement WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Jun 17th, 2008 10:40 AM
Brocade Pays $160 Million to Settle Options-Backdating Suit WSJ_law_blog Class Actions & Defective Products 0 Jun 2nd, 2008 07:00 PM
Former Bristol-Myers Exec Charged Over Secret Settlement WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 24th, 2008 08:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:03 PM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.