WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Barbie Battles Bratz as Toy Makers Head to Trial

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old May 23rd, 2008, 11:21 AM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 562

Default Barbie Battles Bratz as Toy Makers Head to Trial



Was the designer of Bratz dolls — a $500 million per year franchise that’s stolen much of Barbie’s marketshare — still an employee of Mattel when he dreamed up the pouty-lipped dolls beloved by tweenage girls?

That issue, among others, will take center-stage next Tuesday when Mattel, the maker of Barbie, heads to trial in California federal court to square off against closely held MGA Entertainment, the maker of Bratz. The WSJ’s Nick Casey has penned a scintillating walk-up to the trial, which you can find here, along with some cool video reporting.

Mattel, represented by Quinn Emmanuel’s John Quinn, accuses MGA of essentially stealing the idea for Bratz dolls, and is trying to seize ownership of the Bratz line. MGA, rep’d by Skadden’s Tom Nolan, denies wrongdoing, and accuses Mattel in a separate suit of copying Bratz.

Here’s what happened, according to Casey’s story: In 1998, designer Carter Bryant left Mattel and moved back to his parents’ home, at which point he says he had a eureka moment involving the fashions and hair styles of teenagers that led to the Bratz sketches.

In 1999, Bryant signed a new contract with Mattel to design clothes for the Barbie lines. In 2000, Bryant took a vacation day from Mattel to discuss the doll idea with MGA, then jumped ship to MGA and got the Bratz project off the ground. In 2002, Mattel’s CEO received an anonymous letter saying Bryant had created Bratz while at Mattel. In 2004, Mattel hired PIs to spy on one of its own execs who it suspected of leaking secrets. Later that year, Mattel filed a suit against Bryant, accusing him of dreaming up the hit doll while on Mattel’s payroll.

In 2005, MGA counter-sued, claiming Mattel altered the design of its own dolls to more closely resemble the Bratz line and used its sway with retailers to stifle competition. In 2006, Mattel expanded its suit to include MGA and its CEO, Isaac Larian. Bryant, represented separately by John Keker, the same lawyer who represented Dickie Scruggs, agreed to a confidential settlement with Mattel — leaving Mattel and MGA to duke it out. (Mattel didn’t disclose the terms of its settlement with Bryant, but said the agreement will bolster its case; MGA says its position isn’t undermined.)
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Barbie Wears Black: Mattel’s Damages Come in Way Low WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Aug 26th, 2008 05:10 PM
Mattel Gets Big Win in Bratz Trial, Damages TBD Later WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Jul 17th, 2008 08:10 PM
Fen Phen Lawyers, Charged With Bilking Clients, Head to Trial WSJ_law_blog Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 May 12th, 2008 04:51 PM
Hit my head and passed out. webartbyveronica Injury & Worker's Compensation 1 Feb 7th, 2008 08:20 PM
Head Games: Help, before I need Therapy! Laura*lee Child Custody & Support 1 Oct 25th, 2007 04:35 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.