WORLD Law Direct Forums
Home > WORLD Law Direct Forums > FORUM INFORMATION > Law News > D.C. Circuit to Treasury: ‘Yer Money’s No Good Here!’

D.C. Circuit to Treasury: ‘Yer Money’s No Good Here!’

This is a discussion on D.C. Circuit to Treasury: ‘Yer Money’s No Good Here!’ within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; Anyone out there see the movie “ Ray ,” the 2004 biopic of Ray Charles? There’s an early scene in ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old May 20th, 2008, 01:50 PM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default D.C. Circuit to Treasury: ‘Yer Money’s No Good Here!’



Anyone out there see the movie “Ray,” the 2004 biopic of Ray Charles? There’s an early scene in which the blind Charles insists on getting paid in singles so he can weigh the stack and determine whether he’s being stiffed by the band managers.

According to an opinion issued today by the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, that would likely not be an acceptable “coping method” under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Hank Paulson, the Secretary of the Treasury had appealed a declaratory judgment that the Treasury Department’s failure to design and issue paper currency that’s “readily distinguishable to the visually impaired” violates the Act. Paulson’s argument: Coping mechanisms, such as relying on the kindness of strangers, the availability of portable currency readers and credit cards mean there’s no “denial of meaningful access to currency.

But a 2-1 majority of the Court sided with Patrick Sheehan and Otis Stephens, who constituted The American Counsel of the Blind as plaintiffs in the case. “The current design of paper money springs from the world of the sighted,” wrote Judge Janice Rogers. “The Secretary has identified no reason that requires paper currency to be uniform to the touch. Instead, the fact that U.S. paper currency does not include features that are detectable by the visually impaired appears to have been a result of the type of ‘thoughtlessness and indifference’ that . . .Congress targeted under section 504.”

For a brief discussion of the some of the costs associated with revamping the format of currency, check out pages 11-12 of the opinion. Arguing the case for the National Federation of the Blind was Joseph B. Espo. Jonathan F. Cohn, a deputy assistant attorney general, argued the case for the government.

Last edited by top_admin; May 20th, 2008 at 01:57 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge in Kuehne Case Finds Feds’ Charge ‘Disturbing’ WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Dec 1st, 2008 10:10 AM
Was the Massage Chair Sen. Stevens’s ‘Photofete’ Moment? WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 28th, 2008 12:20 PM
‘Not A Potted Plant’: A Look at Ted Stevens’s Lawyer WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 13th, 2008 08:40 PM
A ‘Dating Game’ for Lawyers: Inside the Linens ‘n Things Beauty Pageant WSJ_law_blog Business Bankruptcy 0 May 20th, 2008 09:50 AM
Fallout from L’Affaire Spitzer: ‘Kristen’ Sues ‘Girls Gone Wild’ Founder WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 29th, 2008 01:00 PM


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:00 AM.