WORLD Law Direct Forums  



Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER Legal Forms FAQ Calendar SEARCH Today's Posts MARK FORUMS READ

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-14-2008, 10:51 AM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
07-16-2008 12:37 PM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 271
Default Feds Triple Charges for Bonds, But Legal Exposure Stays the Same



The Feds may have nearly tripled the number of charges against Barry Bonds yesterday, but his legal exposure remains the same. In a re-written indictment unsealed in federal court in San Francisco, Bonds (pictured, in earlier days), who’s accused of lying under oath about his use of steroids, is charged with 14 counts of perjury, up from the original five counts.

“It’s exactly the same,” Golden Gate U. law prof Peter Keane told the AP. “It’s two ways of saying it’s lying and there’s really no substantial difference between what he was charged with then and what he is charged with now.” Another legal eagle told the San Fran Chron that the new indictment wouldn’t necessarily increase Bonds’ likely maximum sentence of 30 months in prison if he is convicted of all the charges at his upcoming trial.

Bonds’ legal team objected to the initial indictment, handed up in November, because by law, the government can accuse a defendant of only one crime per count of an indictment. Bonds lawyer Dennis Riordan contended that the indictment accused Bonds of telling as many as five lies in a single perjury count. Judge Susan Illston agreed, and ordered the government to rewrite the document. The new indictment broke each of the old perjury charges into multiple new ones.

“All the government wanted to do here was cure the indictment to make sure the case could move forward,” Daniel C. Richman, a former prosecutor and Columbia law prof told the NYT. “Ironically, the government’s response was to give the jury more choices on what they can convict him on.”

Last edited by top_admin : 05-14-2008 at 11:06 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bonds Unregistered Trials & Sentencing 1 04-22-2008 03:12 PM
who stays, who goes Unregistered Child Custody & Support 2 04-14-2008 07:44 PM
Miami Lawyer Ben Kuehne, Indicted by Feds, Returns Fire WSJ_law_blog Attorneys & Legal Ethics 0 03-26-2008 02:00 PM
savings bonds Unregistered Miscellaneous Topics 1 11-18-2007 01:36 PM
Fee for US H-1B visas may triple top_admin Government & Administrative Law 1 06-05-2007 12:46 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:56 PM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct. Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.