![]() |
|
|||||||
| Law News Breaking law news and events. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Last Online:
07-16-2008 12:37 PM Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 271
|
![]() We havent played a video game since the spring of 1985, when, as a dweeby 14 year old, we killed countless hours and brain cells after baseball practice at Tustin Lanes, drinking Slurpees and playing Paperboy. So we cant say we know much of anything about this Grand Theft Auto IV, which appears to be all the rage. Fortunately, though, weve got an excuse to bone up on Nico Bellic and his mad, violent world: a lawsuit! Take-Two Interactive, the maker of GTA4, filed a lawsuit earlier today against the Chicago Transit Authority, alleging that the CTA recently pulled down advertisements for the game for no reason. Here are stories from Reuters and the AP (we havent yet been able to locate the complaint, LB readers). According to the Reuters report, Take Two has accused the authority and its sales agent, Titan Outdoor, of violating a $300,000 ad campaign agreement that included running poster ads on the sides of buses and transit display spaces throughout the Chicago transit system scheduled for six weeks between April and June. The suit alleges that the advertisements were reportedly removed following a report by a Fox News affiliate that questioned why the ad was allowed to run after a wave of violent crimes in Chicago. But its not the contractual claim that interests us so much as it is the First Amendment claim, which was also reportedly lodged against the CTA. We dont remember much First Amendment law, but we remember that there may be First Amendment exceptions for speech thats obscene or speech that incites violence. Wed love a little help on this: Anyone out there familiar both with the First Amendment and GTA4 that could put forth a plausible defense on the part of the CTA? Photo: Associated Press Last edited by top_admin : 05-06-2008 at 08:22 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Whats Going on With Marc Dann? Heres What We Know | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | 05-13-2008 10:30 PM |
| Next Stop on Ninos Book Tour: A Riveting Talk with C-SPANs Brian Lamb | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | 05-07-2008 03:11 PM |
| Authority to sign a letterhead | Unregistered | Other Business & Finance Law Issues | 2 | 04-29-2008 06:54 PM |
| Scalia and Garner: Yield Indefensible Terrain Ostentatiously | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | 04-29-2008 06:10 PM |
| Fallout from LAffaire Spitzer: Kristen Sues Girls Gone Wild Founder | WSJ_law_blog | Law News | 0 | 04-29-2008 02:00 PM |