WORLD Law Direct Forums  



Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER Legal Forms FAQ Calendar SEARCH Today's Posts MARK FORUMS READ

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button AddThis Social Bookmark Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 05-06-2008, 06:50 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
07-16-2008 12:37 PM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 271
Default Take-Two Says ‘Take This!’ to Chicago Transit Authority



We haven’t played a video game since the spring of 1985, when, as a dweeby 14 year old, we killed countless hours and brain cells after baseball practice at Tustin Lanes, drinking Slurpees and playing Paperboy. So we can’t say we know much of anything about this Grand Theft Auto IV, which appears to be all the rage.

Fortunately, though, we’ve got an excuse to bone up on Nico Bellic and his mad, violent world: a lawsuit! Take-Two Interactive, the maker of GTA4, filed a lawsuit earlier today against the Chicago Transit Authority, alleging that the CTA recently pulled down advertisements for the game for no reason. Here are stories from Reuters and the AP (we haven’t yet been able to locate the complaint, LB readers).

According to the Reuters report, Take Two has accused the authority and its sales agent, Titan Outdoor, of violating a $300,000 ad campaign agreement that included running poster ads on the sides of buses and transit display spaces throughout the Chicago transit system scheduled for six weeks between April and June.

The suit alleges that the advertisements were reportedly removed following a report by a Fox News affiliate that questioned why the ad was allowed to run after a wave of violent crimes in Chicago.

But it’s not the contractual claim that interests us so much as it is the First Amendment claim, which was also reportedly lodged against the CTA. We don’t remember much First Amendment law, but we remember that there may be First Amendment exceptions for speech that’s obscene or speech that incites violence. We’d love a little help on this: Anyone out there familiar both with the First Amendment and GTA4 that could put forth a plausible defense on the part of the CTA?

Photo: Associated Press

Last edited by top_admin : 05-06-2008 at 08:22 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What’s Going on With Marc Dann? Here’s What We Know WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 05-13-2008 10:30 PM
Next Stop on Nino’s Book Tour: A Riveting Talk with C-SPAN’s Brian Lamb WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 05-07-2008 03:11 PM
Authority to sign a letterhead Unregistered Other Business & Finance Law Issues 2 04-29-2008 06:54 PM
Scalia and Garner: ‘Yield Indefensible Terrain — Ostentatiously’ WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 04-29-2008 06:10 PM
Fallout from L’Affaire Spitzer: ‘Kristen’ Sues ‘Girls Gone Wild’ Founder WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 04-29-2008 02:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 AM.


Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct. Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.