Scalia and Garner: Yield Indefensible Terrain Ostentatiously
This is a discussion on Scalia and Garner: Yield Indefensible Terrain Ostentatiously within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; How do effective advocates persuade courts to decide cases in favor of their clients? That’s the pressing question for which ...
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
News
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,862
|
![]() How do effective advocates persuade courts to decide cases in favor of their clients? That’s the pressing question for which Justice Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner provide a 206-page answer in their new book, Making Your Case: The Art of Persuading Judges, which hit stores yesterday. In the mold of Sun Tzu’s “Art of War,” the book’s 115 sections of advice arm attorneys for the front lines of advocacy. CBS’s Lesley Stahl, interviewing Scalia on “60 Minutes,” called the book “breezy.” Indeed, reading the book last night, the Law Blog found itself absorbed (”engrossed” may be too strong a word) in Scalia and Garner’s prose. This stuff could apply to lawyers, but it could also apply to anyone engaged in the art of persuasion, we thought. So, over the next few days, we’ll be rolling out what we think are the authors’ more interesting or provocative points. For starters: One of the things that immediately jumped out at us is the authors’ advice to acknowledge weakness in arguments right up front. Under the heading: “Yield indefensible terrain — ostentatiously,” they write: “Rarely will all the points, both of fact and law, be in your favor. Openly acknowledge the ones that are against you. In fact, if you’re the appellant, run forth to meet the obvious ones.” On the topic, the authors quote Frederick Bernays Wiener: “Grasp your nettles firmly. No matter how unfavorable the facts are, they will hurt you more if the court first learns them from your opponent. . . .Draw the sting of unpleasant facts by presenting them yourself.” LB Readers, we know this advice is widely taught in law school, but it strikes us now as advice that might be easier to dispense than follow — especially when you’ve got a client paying tens of thousands for, say, an appellate brief. Is this, in actuality, something you litigators out there try to do? Last edited by top_admin; Apr 30th, 2008 at 06:22 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmark & Share |
«
Fallout from LAffaire Spitzer: Kristen Sues Girls Gone Wild Founder
|
Ursus Maritimus Community Roar (Quietly) Over Court Ruling
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Was the Massage Chair Sen. Stevenss Photofete Moment? | WSJ Law Blog | Law News | 0 | Oct 28th, 2008 01:20 PM |
| A Dating Game for Lawyers: Inside the Linens n Things Beauty Pageant | WSJ Law Blog | Business Bankruptcy | 0 | May 20th, 2008 10:50 AM |
| Scalia and Garner: You Are What You Wear | WSJ Law Blog | Law News | 0 | May 1st, 2008 03:20 PM |
| Scalia and Garner: Improve Your Writing by Improving Your Reading | WSJ Law Blog | Law News | 0 | Apr 30th, 2008 02:40 PM |
| Fallout from LAffaire Spitzer: Kristen Sues Girls Gone Wild Founder | WSJ Law Blog | Law News | 0 | Apr 29th, 2008 02:00 PM |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 AM.









Linear Mode

