WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Law Blog Lawyer of the Day: David Laufman, Friend of the Mini-Dulcimer

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 25th, 2008, 02:30 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 638

Default Law Blog Lawyer of the Day: David Laufman, Friend of the Mini-Dulcimer

Law Blog colleague Heather Won Tesoriero, who, way back in the day, filled in nobly as the Law Blogger, kindly filed the following dispatch with us:



One day last fall, David Laufman, a partner and trade controls expert at Kelley Drye & Warren in Washington, got an unexpected call. The man on the other end of the line was the son of Manoochehr Sadeghi, a virtuoso of the mini-dulcimer and professor of ethnomusicology at UCLA. Max Sadeghi explained that his father was missing some of his instruments and needed Laufman’s help. Intrigued, Laufman followed up.

The backstory that emerged: For years, Manoochehr Sadeghi had gotten his mini-dulcimers (also called santurs) from Iran — through an uncle in Tehran who sent them to Los Angeles.

Despite the U.S. trade sanctions against Iran that have been in place since 1979, the shipments always sailed through without problem. Sadeghi says he wasn’t aware that the santur shipments violated any laws and was just pleased to avoid playing “mediocre, amateurish” santurs sold here.

However, the mini-dulcimer free-flow from Tehran to L.A. stopped last summer when Sadeghi got a notice from DHL that his santurs had been seized and could be destroyed. Sadeghi told his son about his dilemma. His reaction: I’ll find you an attorney. Max Sadeghi trawled the Internet and discovered Laufman.

The lawyer says he was “enchanted” by the case, and further intrigued when he learned of the prestigious accolades of his client. Sadeghi, who’s lived in the U.S. since 1964, has performed at the Kennedy Center before heads of state and received a National Heritage Award from the National Endowment for the Arts. “My goal was to appeal to the reason and the humanity of the enforcement people whose first inclination might be to say no,” says Laufman.

The lawyer’s concern, however, was that even though mini-dulcimers aren’t a threat to homeland security, the rules are the rules. The sanctions have been in place since 1979. “I thought it’ll be easy for the Treasury to punt and say I’m sure he’s a nice man, but…”

So, what lawyerly strategies does one employ to free the mini-dulcimers? First, Laufman scoured the exceptions to the sanctions, which include publications, films, posters, compact discs and newswire feeds. (Our favorite: phonograph records.) “I looked and looked and could not find the exception for dulcimers,” Laufman says.

Once that was off the table, Laufman set about preparing a compendium of documentation of his client’s professional and artistic standing—garnering letters of support from a Smithsonian official and the Mayor of Beverly Hills (an Iranian and former santur student of Sadeghi). In his package, he acknowledged that the dulcimers didn’t have the appropriate licensing from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) but argued that the instruments met the requirements for the regulatory exceptions made for informational materials and gifts. Furthermore, Laufman argued, even if they didn’t meet those exceptions, this was an ideal case for OFAC to exercise its discretion.

He sent his dossier out on Dec. 5 and at the end of January, he received a letter from OFAC which stated: “Mr. Manoochehr Sadeghi is hereby authorized to engage in all transactions necessary to receive delivery from Iran of four miniature hammered dulcimers (santurs) seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection on or about August 30, 2007.”

Said Sadeghi: “I’m so, so pleased. Mr. Laufman and his staff treated this case as if it was just as important as a big case.”

Last edited by top_admin : Apr 26th, 2008 at 07:26 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Law Blog Pardon Post of the Day: So What About Ted Stevens? WSJ_law_blog Law News 1 Dec 2nd, 2008 05:08 PM
Law Blog Lawyers of the Day: Nicole Seligman and Marcia Goldstein WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Nov 10th, 2008 03:00 PM
Law Blog Lawyer of the Day: The SEC’s Morgan Ward Doran WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Oct 1st, 2008 01:10 PM
Law Blog Lawyer of the Day: O’Melveny’s A.B. Culvahouse WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Jun 24th, 2008 02:50 PM
Law Blog Former Lawyer of the Day: Will Hopkins WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 23rd, 2008 04:21 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.