WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Judges in Skilling Argument Hold Cards Close to the Vest

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 3rd, 2008, 01:04 AM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 640

Default Judges in Skilling Argument Hold Cards Close to the Vest



Law Blog colleague Amir Efrati flew all the way to New Orleans yesterday to cover the appellate argument over Jeff Skilling’s conviction. From the early report, sounds like poor Amir got a raw deal — the argument was a bit of a snoozer. (Hope you at least got some good etouffee, buddy!)

The lowdown: According to the report, the judges on the panel stayed largely silent during oral arguments, giving little indication of their thinking on the case. Too bad. We’d hoped to hear tales of riveting debate over the brief recently submitted by the defense arguing the government had withheld crucial evidence from the defense. No dice. The judges scarcely discussed that evidence.

The focus of Wednesday’s hearing was a federal fraud statute which aims to punish an employee who deprives his employer of “honest services.” Shortly after Skilling was convicted in the spring of 2006, the Fifth Circuit overturned several convictions based on the honest-services theory. In the so-called “Nigerian Barge” case, brought against several former executives at Enron and Merrill Lynch for making a deal that allegedly fraudulently boosted Enron’s earnings, the court said the honest-services theory couldn’t be used to prosecute an employee whose fraudulent acts were intended to benefit corporate interests, such as meeting earnings targets, rather than their own. (Some of the defendants are facing a retrial.)
At the hearing Wednesday, the judges let Skilling’s lawyer, Dan Petrocelli, and the government’s lawyer, Douglas Wilson, argue why that ruling should or shouldn’t apply to Mr. Skilling’s case.

So does Skilling have a chance? Yes, at least according to this Houston Chronicle article. Referring to the Nigerian Barge decision, which called into question lower court judge Sim Lake’s handling of the “honest services” issue, White-Collar Crime Prof Blog author Peter Henning told the Chron: “It’s like dropping a rock in a pond and what the ripple effect will be. He’s got the error. Now it’s just how far he runs with it.”

Last edited by top_admin : Jun 16th, 2008 at 09:19 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nonparty preclusion post Taylor v. Sturgell - Oral Argument b4 Elizabeth D. Laporte Unregistered Attorneys & Legal Ethics 12 Nov 20th, 2008 02:19 AM
short sale problems after close FLREHelp Mortgages, Refinancing, Foreclosure 0 Sep 15th, 2008 05:28 PM
A Good Path to a Supreme Court Argument? Clerk for a Justice WSJ_law_blog Courts, Decisions, Appeals 0 Apr 14th, 2008 01:00 PM
Jeff (Skilling) Stands by His Dan WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 1st, 2008 09:12 PM
Buyer won't close rayesspot Buying & Selling Property 4 Oct 26th, 2007 06:55 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2009 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.