WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > Forum Information > Law News
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Law News Breaking law news and events.

Judge Denies Punitives for Bedbug Plaintiffs, But Lets Case Go to Trial

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 31st, 2008, 08:50 AM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 563

Default Judge Denies Punitives for Bedbug Plaintiffs, But Lets Case Go to Trial

Good night, sleep tight,
Don’t let the bedbugs bite.
And if they do
Then take your shoe
And knock ‘em ‘til
They’re black and blue!




Of all the things that go bump in the night, bedbugs might be the creepiest. But not so creepy, apparently, that they lead automatically to punitive damages.

Manhattan judge Judith J. Gische has, uh, scratched a request for punitive damages by two bedbug plaintiffs, while allowing their negligence claims to go forward. Debra Grogan and her daughter, Dana, both Maryland residents, were seeking $2 million in compensatory damages and an unspecified amount of punitives for bites they allegedly sustained during a two-night stay in New York City’s Milford Plaza in 2003. Click here for the gory details of the Grogan case, and here for a 2006 LB post on a different bedbug bite case.

In ruling out punitive damages, Gische distinguished a precedent on the grounds that, in a past case where the plaintiffs had won punis, the hotel in question had been aware of the bedbugs but decided not to fumigate the premises. Milford Plaza, by contrast, had under contract a pest control company, which, three weeks prior to the Grogan’s stay, had been asked to exterminate bedbugs in two rooms near the room reserved by the Grogans.

However, Judge Gische wrote, the Grogans had presented enough evidence that the hotel had “constructive notice” of the need to fumigate room 1540 to deny the defendants’ summary judgment motion. The case must go to trial, Gische ruled, because Novak’s affidavit “set forth genuine issues of fact about the life span of bedbugs, how they migrate and whether these factors should have been (or were) taken into consideration by the defendants in how rooms were treated following bedbug complaints by other guests.”

Milford Plaza is represented by Andrew J. Funk of Smith Mazure, while the Grogans are represented by Hayley R. Greenberg of Greenberg & Merola.

Last edited by top_admin : Jun 16th, 2008 at 09:17 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge to Allow 'S-word' at MySpace Trial WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Nov 17th, 2008 10:10 AM
Judge lets Jeffs' attorneys talk to Texas officers (AP) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Oct 29th, 2008 04:30 AM
Judge: Woman in Iraqi spy case unfit for trial (AP) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Sep 17th, 2008 09:50 AM
Judge denies "squawk box" case dismissal (Reuters) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Sep 12th, 2008 03:40 PM
Judge in Potter Trial Calls on Parties to Settle WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Apr 15th, 2008 07:50 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms

Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.