WORLD Law Direct Forums
Home > WORLD Law Direct Forums > FORUM INFORMATION > Law News > Judge Denies Punitives for Bedbug Plaintiffs, But Lets Case Go to Trial

Judge Denies Punitives for Bedbug Plaintiffs, But Lets Case Go to Trial

This is a discussion on Judge Denies Punitives for Bedbug Plaintiffs, But Lets Case Go to Trial within the Law News forum, part of the FORUM INFORMATION category; Good night, sleep tight, Don’t let the bedbugs bite. And if they do Then take your shoe And knock ‘em ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 31st, 2008, 08:50 AM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default Judge Denies Punitives for Bedbug Plaintiffs, But Lets Case Go to Trial

Good night, sleep tight,
Don’t let the bedbugs bite.
And if they do
Then take your shoe
And knock ‘em ‘til
They’re black and blue!




Of all the things that go bump in the night, bedbugs might be the creepiest. But not so creepy, apparently, that they lead automatically to punitive damages.

Manhattan judge Judith J. Gische has, uh, scratched a request for punitive damages by two bedbug plaintiffs, while allowing their negligence claims to go forward. Debra Grogan and her daughter, Dana, both Maryland residents, were seeking $2 million in compensatory damages and an unspecified amount of punitives for bites they allegedly sustained during a two-night stay in New York City’s Milford Plaza in 2003. Click here for the gory details of the Grogan case, and here for a 2006 LB post on a different bedbug bite case.

In ruling out punitive damages, Gische distinguished a precedent on the grounds that, in a past case where the plaintiffs had won punis, the hotel in question had been aware of the bedbugs but decided not to fumigate the premises. Milford Plaza, by contrast, had under contract a pest control company, which, three weeks prior to the Grogan’s stay, had been asked to exterminate bedbugs in two rooms near the room reserved by the Grogans.

However, Judge Gische wrote, the Grogans had presented enough evidence that the hotel had “constructive notice” of the need to fumigate room 1540 to deny the defendants’ summary judgment motion. The case must go to trial, Gische ruled, because Novak’s affidavit “set forth genuine issues of fact about the life span of bedbugs, how they migrate and whether these factors should have been (or were) taken into consideration by the defendants in how rooms were treated following bedbug complaints by other guests.”

Milford Plaza is represented by Andrew J. Funk of Smith Mazure, while the Grogans are represented by Hayley R. Greenberg of Greenberg & Merola.

Last edited by top_admin; Jun 16th, 2008 at 09:17 AM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge denies Polanski rape case defense bid (AFP) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Jan 10th, 2009 03:00 PM
In Big Punitives Case, Has Court Painted Itself into a Corner? WSJ_law_blog Law News 0 Dec 3rd, 2008 07:30 PM
Judge lets Jeffs' attorneys talk to Texas officers (AP) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Oct 29th, 2008 04:30 AM
Judge: Woman in Iraqi spy case unfit for trial (AP) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Sep 17th, 2008 09:50 AM
Judge denies "squawk box" case dismissal (Reuters) Yahoo!_news Crimes and Trials News 0 Sep 12th, 2008 03:40 PM


Powered by U.S. Legal Forms


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 AM.