![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Last Online:
Apr 30th, 2008 11:47 PM Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
|
I work for a consulting company say A, I went to a project like, company A signed a contract with B, B signed a contract with C, C signed a contract with D (which is the client), in short D only know C and C only know B and B has direct contract with A. Now the client (D) wants to hire me but I have signed an agreement with A stating that I cannot accept employment (for 1 year) with any customer (I can guess that D is not a customer of A) and third party entity with whom I had been placed on behalf of A. I am concerned for this third party entity, can D be a third party entity of A where I have been placed on behalf of A (in my thinking I was placed to D on behalf of C because D only knows C). Can anyone please help me on this matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Top Level Member
Last Online:
Sep 25th, 2008 02:24 PM Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 450
|
Your contract should make that clear it may say only the company that is directly hired--it may say any job directly or indirectly connected...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Last Online:
Apr 30th, 2008 11:47 PM Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2
|
The contract is like
During the course of (unless otherwise directed by and done on behalf of A) and for the one (1) year period following the termination of your employment with A, you agree not to directly or indirectly (i) solicit the business of or become employed by any customer (I can see that D is not a customer of A, it is a customer of C) or third party entity with whom you had been placed on behalf of A, and (ii) solicit for employment any person(s) employed by A. You agree that A will be entitled for injunctive relief as well as damages for any voilation by you of this paragraph. I am concerned about this third party entity, can D be a third party entity for A where I have been placed on behalf of A. As D have no connection with the two primary entities A & B, it's C who has direct connection with any one the primary entities, in this case B. Can you please elaborate on this in detail. Thanks! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| third party | laica | Divorce, Separation, Annulment | 0 | Apr 4th, 2008 08:37 AM |
| Contract Working for a seprate business entity | shocker-z | Business Contracts & Partnerships | 2 | Sep 12th, 2007 05:22 AM |
| THIRD PARTY PAYMENT | Unregistered | Elder Law | 1 | Jan 29th, 2007 08:49 PM |
| Third Party violation? | serenity | Domestic Violence & Abuse | 1 | Nov 12th, 2006 12:18 PM |
| Liability for injury to party guests during and after the party | Unregistered | Civil Litigation | 1 | Oct 31st, 2006 01:47 AM |