![]() |
|
|||||||
| International Law News Legal news and events around the world. |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran Member
Last Online:
Jul 31st, 2008 06:18 AM Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 98
|
Japanese drug-maker Daiichi Sankyos acquisition of Ranbaxy, Indias leading pharma company, through a buyout of promoter stake is indeed a momentous event in Indian corporate history. This is not the first time that an Indian promoter has sold out. But the scale is surely without precedence.
It shows that Indias new generation of leaders, unlike their fathers and grandfathers, may not be unduly attached to family businesses. Clearly, with the onset of the product patent regime in 2005, the environment has become difficult for local pharmaceutical companies. While opportunity to copy patented drugs through reverse engineering has disappeared, their relatively small size has prevented them from undertaking extremely costly new drug discovery. And the increasing competition in the generics space has eroded margins. Even the lucrative Para IV patent challenges in the US have lost their sheen of late because of high costs, increased competition and patent-holders themselves launching authorised generics. Ranbaxy has tried to grow organically through acquisitions with some success as a larger share of its revenue is overseas. This deal is an indication that in the current environment it is easier for an overseas pharma company such as Daiichi to acquire an Indian company to exploit the advantage of low cost and talent than for an Indian company to leverage the same to acquire global scale. If that were the case then we could see more such sell-outs in the pharma space. The outright sell-out, as opposed to a strategic stake sale, perhaps has something to do with the far greater opportunities available in Indian market. Ranbaxy promoters, who would corner close to Rs 10,000 crore through the deal, already have financial services (Religare) and health services (Fortis) businesses that can be grown further through capital infusion. Then there is a host of opportunities in the infrastructure space where such funds can be easily deployed. The deal bodes well for corporate restructuring in India wherein business could pass on to those who see greater value in them. Promoter reluctance to give up control is a key reason why private equity has not quite taken off in terms of outright acquisitions in India. That could change if generation-next is able to let go off family businesses. Ms. Bobby Aanand, Metropolitan Jury |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fair deal? | huffamuse | Other Family Law Matters | 5 | Nov 24th, 2008 08:53 PM |
| Daiichi Sankyo gets a patent advantage | Metropolitanjury | International Law News | 0 | Jun 16th, 2008 06:10 AM |
| Pfizer may counter Daiichi`s Ranbaxy offer | Metropolitanjury | International Law News | 0 | Jun 14th, 2008 06:27 AM |
| what is the deal | Unregistered | Landlord vs Tenant Issues | 1 | May 27th, 2008 07:34 AM |
| Deal of the lifetime???? | mr_dubai | Business Contracts & Partnerships | 1 | Nov 24th, 2007 02:00 PM |