Gitmo Case: Reactions from Around the Web

This is a discussion on Gitmo Case: Reactions from Around the Web within the Human Rights forum, part of the International Law Issues category; Earlier today, the High Court ruled that foreign nationals held at Gitmo have a right to pursue habeas challenges to ...

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply

 

Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 12th, 2008, 04:00 PM   #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,438

Default Gitmo Case: Reactions from Around the Web



Earlier today, the High Court ruled that foreign nationals held at Gitmo have a right to pursue habeas challenges to their detention. In its 5-4 ruling in Boumediene v. Bush, the Court ruled that if Congress wishes to suspend habeas, it must do so only as the Constitution allows — when the country faces rebellion or invasion. Now the question of whether detainees are entitled to be released is left to district court judges in Washington, who are already deliberating how to handle the cases. (Gavel bang: Scotusblog)

In the meantime, we’ve rounded up several different takes on the ruling and its consequences.

What’s the big deal?

Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, GWU prof Orin Kerr says the ruling is pretty much exactly what he predicted would happen in his Senate testimony over a year ago. “Nothing I’ve seen in the Court’s opinion so far is at all surprising,” writes Kerr, “and it’s a big defeat for the Bush Administration. This doesn’t mean I have some amazing powers of observation; rather, I think this was a defeat that you could see coming from miles (or in this case, years) away.”

Some things the opinion does NOT do: At the Balkinization blog, Georgetown’s Marty Lederman says that while the decision is momentous because the petitioners will be able to have their habeas petitions considered in district court, the Supreme Court did not reach at least four important questions: (1) Whether the Constitution applies to detainees held outside Gitmo; (2) What the substantive standard for detention is; (3) Whether GTMO should be closed (”[A]lthough,” writes Lederman, “it basically undermines the Administration’s principal reason for using GTMO in the first place, which was to keep the courts from reviewing the legality of the Executive’s conduct”); and, (4) Whether the administration should do away with the military commission trials.

“Good Day in Gitmo, Bad Day in Iraq”: That’s the title of a post over at Slate’s Convictions blog. Munaf v. Geren, another case decided today that involved U.S. citizens held by Americans in Iraq “is hardly pro-detainee,” writes Slate. “In a unanimous decision, the court ruled that while the U.S. federal courts have jurisdiction to hear the habeas petitions of Munaf and Omar (the U.S. citizen detainees), they would lose on the merits of their habeas claims — and there’s therefore no justification for blocking their transfer to the Iraqi authorities for criminal prosecution.”

Judge Posner is vindicated: In 2002, when the government first took the position that, because the detainees were captured overseas and held at GITMO they were beyond the protection of U.S. courts, Judge Richard Posner told the WSJ it was “absurd” to argue that prisoners’ rights “depend on the fact that they are stuck in Guantanamo rather than in the U.S.” Voila!

Last edited by top_admin; Jun 12th, 2008 at 07:57 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark & Share



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

| More

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Format Your Messages
Add Forum to Google Toolbar
Forum Jump

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Censored web critic wins Chinese court case FT_news China News 1 May 26th, 2009 11:00 AM
U.S. lawyer hopeful on Sudan Gitmo detainees (Reuters) Yahoo!_news International Law News 1 Apr 30th, 2009 08:05 PM
Fed. judge says courts can handle Gitmo cases (AP) Yahoo!_news International Law News 0 Apr 2nd, 2009 03:50 PM
Beijing fire evokes mixed reactions FT_news China News 0 Feb 13th, 2009 02:00 PM
Government Wins Conviction in Second Gitmo Trial WSJ_law_blog International Law News 0 Nov 3rd, 2008 11:40 AM


International Law Issues?


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:46 PM.