WORLD Law Direct Forums  





Go Back   WORLD Law Direct Forums > International Law > International Law Issues > Human Rights
REGISTER FAQ SEARCH Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Personal Lawyer Legal Forms Calendar

Human Rights Human rights and humanitarian law.

U.S. v. Canada When It Comes to Free Speech

Consult Your Own Personal Lawyer Now!
Reply
AddThis Feed Button
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 12th, 2008, 12:00 PM     #1
News
 
WSJ_law_blog's Avatar
 
Last Online:
Jul 16th, 2008 11:37 AM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: The Wall Street Journal's Law Blog
Posts: 549

Default U.S. v. Canada When It Comes to Free Speech



Oliver Wendell Holmes, photographed in 1900, served 30 years on the U.S. Supreme Court and had the nickname the “Great Dissenter” because of his liberal views. (AP Photo)


Last week’s report that actress Brigitte Bardot had been convicted of provoking racial hatred by writing that Muslims are destroying France brought to mind an important difference between the U.S. and Europe: When it comes to offensive speech, the U.S., in the words of Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, tends to leave regulation to the marketplace of ideas.

In today’s NYT, an article by Adam Liptak teaches us that our free speech policies also diverge from those of our neighbor to the north. Liptak reports that Maclean’s, Canada’s leading newsweekly, is on trial for publishing an article arguing that the rise of Islam threatened Western values.

Two members of the Canadian Islamic Congress say Maclean’s violated a provincial hate speech law by stirring up hatred against Muslims. They seek a ruling that the magazine be forbidden from saying similar things, forced to publish a rebuttal and made to compensate Muslims for injuring their “dignity, feelings and self-respect.”

Ironically, the article in question, “The Future Belongs to Islam,” was an excerpt from a book by Mark Steyn called “America Alone,” which is reportedly about how the U.S. takes a different path when it comes to its treatment of hate speech. Liptak writes that Canada, England, France, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, Australia and India all have laws or have signed international conventions banning hate speech. Israel and France forbid the sale of Nazi items like swastikas and flags. It is a crime to deny the Holocaust in Canada, Germany and France.

In his opening statement in the Canadian magazine case, reports the NYT, the Canadian Islamic Congress’s lawyer, Faisal Joseph, told a three-member panel of the tribunal that they “are the only thing between racist, hateful, contemptuous Islamophobic and irresponsible journalism, and law-abiding Canadian citizens.”

In response, the lawyer for Maclean’s, Roger D. McConchie, criticized the hate speech law: “Innocent intent is not a defense. Nor is truth. Nor is fair comment on true facts. Publication in the public interest and for the public benefit is not a defense. Opinion expressed in good faith is not a defense. Responsible journalism is not a defense.”

Last edited by top_admin : Jun 12th, 2008 at 03:14 PM.
WSJ_law_blog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Add Forum to Google Toolbar | Format Your Messages

Posting Rules

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is freedom of speech a ticket to use profane and vulgar language? dlima Government & Administrative Law 4 Aug 15th, 2008 12:42 AM
Freedom of speech mahmut68 Law Wiki 0 Jul 7th, 2008 08:06 AM
Free Help? Unregistered Child Custody & Support 5 Sep 17th, 2007 08:57 AM
Freedom Of Speech?? Unregistered Other Labor Law Matters 1 Dec 30th, 2006 01:32 PM
Freedom of Speech? Hollie Civil Litigation 2 Nov 16th, 2006 07:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 AM.


Subscribe

Use of the Forums is subject to our Disclaimer which prohibits unapproved advertisements, solicitations or other commercial messages, and false, harassing or abusive statements. All postings reflect the views of the author but become the property of WORLD Law Direct.

Questions and information submitted in the Forums are assumed inquiries for general information and not legal advice.

Copyright 2000-2008 by WORLDLawDirect.com, Inc.